• Grimfelion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree… unregulated capitalism will always be corrupt. We’re seeing that now…

    But again… you literally can’t place power in the hands of the people because someone (or a small cabal) will always rise to the top and assume control and we end up in the same spot under a different name…

    • TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you looks at history “regulated” capitalism eventually deregulates because it’s in the interests of the rich to do so and even “regulated” capitalism has exploited the global south for decades and decades. I reject your idea that a few will always rise to the top and be malicious with the power, but even saying that’s true how is that any worse than the current state? I would rather at least try to find a new way to do things than resigning the world to having this be its peak where millions are hungry and destitute.

      • Nougat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Echoing you here:

        Yes, we’ve already seen that in every version of “owners taking advantage of labor” from feudalism to capitalism has tended to produce corrupt people at the top. It’s kind of built into that kind of system. People are incorrectly assuming that changing the fundamental system to “labor produces and is compensated for it” will experience the same corruption. Maybe it will, if corrupt people gain ownership of that system, and take it back to “owners taking advantage of labor.”

        But how about we fucking give it a try and see what happens? You’re right; it can’t be worse than what we already have.