Leftist twitter is just people endlessly namedropping “really important” theory that they haven’t actually read and using to it support arguments based solely on the title of the work, or if they’re feeling bold, the wikipedia summary of it.
gene roddenberry’s kevin sorbo is space jesus
lysenkoism is one of the things i’m still dubious about.
My limited understanding is that jarovization actually brought results and let the Soviet Union produce more wheat with their number of sowing machines.
And his idea that spring wheat can be turned into winter wheat through epigenetics doesn’t seem implausible either.
The rejection of genetics was a mistake of course but just look what the west was doing in the name of Darwinism.
The thing about Dialectical Materialism it’s a scientific framework that, even if incomplete, produces results.
In other words read book yes.
It’s missing chemical X I’ll go get some at The Home Depot™ real quick brb
When reading Engels, I had an impression that he tried to explain the concept of feedback loops, before that terminology was invented, so he had to use the terminology that was available to him - Hegel’s dialectics.
