• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Not really.

      Remember that Elmo just lies his ass off almost all the time.

      Over promises and under delivery are such extreme understatements with him, almost everything bhe says is just pure imaginary bullshit

      Lying his ass off literally is the only thing he does well, it made Tesla stocks balloon to being overvalued somewhere in 10-100 times their actual value

      Remember hyperloop, that project that even high schoolers could identify as absolutely dumb? Billions and billions in investment money has been wasted on absolute bullshit that will never work.

      But what about SpaceX, I hear you type?

      Remember how we’d land on Mars in 2018, now 7-8 years ago? Yeah, Elmo is currently at about 1% of that particular promise. Again, it’s not under delivery, it’s just actual plain bullshit

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Musk is just Nazi-washing what he stole from Wikipedia, he doesn’t have the base of volunteers and employees to maintain his latest toy. A year from now, it will be gone and forgotten, and we’ll all be shouting at each other to go vote.

  • tino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Anybody going there to test “how bad it is” is giving them traffic, which they can use to brag about its success. Personally, I’d rather completely ignore it and disregard whoever mention it one day as a source, which will never happen hopefuly.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    ‘Not optimistic he will create anything very useful right now’

    Or ever create anything (he’s just stealing other people’s creations, at best)

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Jimmy Wales: Libertarian that ended up creating perhaps the most successful collectivist project of all time.

    • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      this is a perfect example of why we should always allow an escape space for everyone. Sometimes that person in the space you are polar opposed too will create something that defies even their own rules

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I consider myself libertarian and absolutely love Wikipedia! In fact, if I didn’t have to work, I’d work on FOSS full time.

          Libertarians have no issues with collectivism, they only have issues with forced collectivism. Libertarians love private unions, co-ops, non-profits, etc.

          • snowboardbumvt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            That’s how most libertarians I’ve talked to think. There are some people who call themselves libertarians who actually just want the government out of the way so mega corps can control everything, but i don’t think Jimmy Wales is one of them.

            • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              There’s an element of vibe contrarianism in any pronounced political ideology. Meaning that libertarians often hate what they perceive as anti-libertarian, communists often hate what they perceive as anti-communist, and so on.

              In that regard yes, there are plenty of libertarians who just want to kill anything with leftist vibes with fire.

              But the world of ideas is far richer than the existing conventions and established ideologies, and every person has their own trajectory in that.

              • snowboardbumvt@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I agree. This is what I’ve observed: Pride and moral superiority are the primary sources of political extremism. Any attempt to reason in that emotional state is going to be filled with a ton of confirmation bias. Mix in some greed and it gets even worse.

                These people have a tendency to strongly identify with their particular brand of ideology and consider any challenge a threat. They label people that disagree as evil or stupid which makes them feel even more certain in their moral superiority. They close their minds to any dissenting opinions and hide in their echo chambers continuing the vicious cycle because being right feels good and being wrong feels bad.

                Some humility and genuine curiosity are ways to reverse the cycle.

      • odelik@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Effect vs affect: Use ‘impact’ instead of having to worry about two words that essentially mean the same thing but are context based.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          They don’t mean the same thing. Effect means to actively change something. Affect means to have passively receive a change.

          • odelik@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yes, hence the second part of the sentence.

            Unless you need to use the precise word for communicating the “context difference”, just use the word impact(ed/ing/s). Makes it a lot easier for ESL speakers as well.

            Even then, most people can understand the meaning of the misused word due to the context of what’s being discussed anyways.

  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s not about making something useful. He and a few others are cloning everything any of their cult might use to further fence them in from external information and entertainment.

    They’re having a harder time in entertainment, because artists tend to be more liberal, but they’re gaining ground there, too. After a certain point, they’ll just radically censor everything else.

    • Bristlecone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is what scares me. The fact that they are doing it at all. It’s providing more spaces for people to shut themselves in completely with the information they want. These fucking desperate bigots will never be satisfied until the entire world reflects their bigoted ass beliefs, but since that will never happen they will fight a civil war for Elon out of sheer ignorant self obsession, instead