This one does absolutely nothing for me despite how busy it is, but semper post, and all that.

I am interested in why he drew the priest like that, however.

https://theonion.com/whos-bad/

  • Piltdowntown [they/them, any]@hexbear.netEnglish
    7·
    1 month ago

    It’s astonishing to me how people are so eager to believe the most obvious child predator since Ian Watkins was somehow against all logic actually innocent. He literally bragged about sleeping with children. Hell he’s dead if you really wanted to do the “seperate art form artist” song and dance it has literally never been easier you can’t give royalties to a child predator any more.

    • FatVegan@leminal.spaceEnglish
      3·
      1 month ago

      I think it’s more complicated than that. I never liked Michael Jackson, not hia music abd didn’t care for him as a person. But the people who let their kids sleep at the neverland ranch who accused him were all even bigger pieces of shit and unreliable. They were clearly just after a paycheck. I believe that he said that whole sleeping with children thing, but i also believe that he only said that because of how innocent he assumed it was. Imo the moat reliable source in this whole ordeal is macaulay culkin. From what i heard and read about him, he’s not really afraid to out people in his life and career about their bullshit. And he was there too, he was his “friend” and ghe never had anything bad to say about him and talked about these “sleepovers”. Michael was fucked in the brain, never had a childhood, had no idea what money was worth, had no real friends and all that shit. Maybe he fucked some kids in his career, fuck him. But going off the usual accusations is kinda bs. There are real pedophiles still alive and kicking and in charge of the world.