The recent transformation of the state’s election laws explicitly enabled citizens to file unlimited challenges to other voters’ registrations. Experts warn that election officials’ handling of some of those challenges may clash with federal law.

  • worldwidewave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Trying to erroneously remove someone’s ability to vote needs to be a crime. This is denying citizens their sovereign rights, and people need to be held accountable when this is done fraudulently.

    • Pratai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh it’s absolutely a crime already. But only if the left were to attempt it.

  • books@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just for the record. Dems can do this too. Guarantee some of these trumpets have a lake home and a real home and it would be pretty easy to challenge residency.

    Assuming that their challenge law is simple, which if someone challenged 100,000 voters it kinda seems to be.

    Fyi. Someone tried this in Montana in the 2000s and was chided out of court.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If there’s no penalty for false challenges, Democrats should challenge every Republican registration.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fuck that. Let’s run a script to programmatically file challenges for all Republican voter registrations. If they really want to play this game, I am down to clown, motherfuckers.

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Republican majority board, if they could guess who’s who from where the challenges come from they might just game it anyway

    • evatronic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      In light of the fact that the US has no national ID, and the Constitutional ban on poll taxes, combined with the requirement individual states run their own elections, registration is the best option there is.

      We need a way to ensure people are eligible to vote, and a way to ensure people only vote once. A big list of “people who can vote” is the answer.

      That said: getting on the list should be easy. Removing someone from the list should be hard.

  • blazera@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh yeah the same state with the illegitimate republican governor that oversaw his own election.

    Theyre all about the sanctity of elections

  • books@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Usually isn’t any penalty.

    I also did a quick Google search and it looks easy AF.

    Just need money to buy the datasets and rudimentary SQL knowledge to run a query.