- 3 Posts
- 2.54K Comments
deleted by creator
Pratai@lemmy.caOPto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Not sure if this is allowed, and if it's not, can someone direct me to where it is- but.... what is considered to be the most unbiased lemmy instance?520·1 year agoI only really bias towards empirical truth and evidence. Along with accepting that life provides a shit ton of nuance and not wavering is it should be as polarized as people make it out to be.
This goes for pretty much everything.
Pratai@lemmy.caOPto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Not sure if this is allowed, and if it's not, can someone direct me to where it is- but.... what is considered to be the most unbiased lemmy instance?27·1 year agoI’m not right leaning at all, but neither piracy, nor anarchy are things I’m interested in.
Pratai@lemmy.cato News@lemmy.world•Trump Allies Plan New Sweeping Abortion Restrictions193·1 year agoRemember though…. The kids’ll tell you that both sides are equally as bad.
Pratai@lemmy.cato News@lemmy.world•Chemical Found In Cheerios, Quaker Oats May Cause Fertility Issues, Study Suggests: What To Know About Chlormequat163·1 year agoChlormequat- sounds like a MAGA approved miracle injection to me.
Pratai@lemmy.caOPto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Not sure if this is allowed, and if it's not, can someone direct me to where it is- but.... what is considered to be the most unbiased lemmy instance?142·1 year agoThat’s a pretty fair point. Gotta admit.
Pratai@lemmy.caOPto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Not sure if this is allowed, and if it's not, can someone direct me to where it is- but.... what is considered to be the most unbiased lemmy instance?620·1 year agoI don’t like bias. And try not to have one of my own.
Pratai@lemmy.caOPto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Not sure if this is allowed, and if it's not, can someone direct me to where it is- but.... what is considered to be the most unbiased lemmy instance?11·1 year agoI’m going to check that out. Thanks!
Pratai@lemmy.caOPto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Not sure if this is allowed, and if it's not, can someone direct me to where it is- but.... what is considered to be the most unbiased lemmy instance?31·1 year agoIsn’t mastodon more like Twitter? I’m not crazy familiar with it to be honest.
Pratai@lemmy.cato politics @lemmy.world•Romney rules out voting for Trump, citing court’s sexual abuse finding in Carroll case2·1 year agoScroll up and look who responded to who. I posted here and THEY followed me. Fuck this place. This sub annd that clown deserve each other. Blocking both.
If lemmy goes to shit because clowns like that are allowed to do and say as they please… let it.
Pratai@lemmy.cato politics @lemmy.world•Romney rules out voting for Trump, citing court’s sexual abuse finding in Carroll case41·1 year agoMaybe if someone actually did something about them, they wouldn’t be here for anyone to engage with them… but that’s just me…
And look at that…. My comment which accused him of exactly what he accused me of- was removed…. Yet his remains. This is fucking pathetic.
Pratai@lemmy.cato politics @lemmy.world•Romney rules out voting for Trump, citing court’s sexual abuse finding in Carroll case4·1 year agoLast time I’m going to say this. Write it down:
I unblocked you so I can warn others that fall for your bait to steer clear of you so as not to get banned. I will continue to NOT block you on this account for this reason and this reason alone.
For the health of lemmy and the ability for people to freely intersect here- people need to know when they’re dealing with bait-trolls.
This response is for the benefit of anyone reading along. I will not entertain your trolling any further. And for anyone that may not believe what I’m saying, please look at their comment history.
I’ll rest my case here.
Pratai@lemmy.cato politics @lemmy.world•Romney rules out voting for Trump, citing court’s sexual abuse finding in Carroll case3·1 year agoSent you a private message about this.
Pratai@lemmy.cato politics @lemmy.world•Romney rules out voting for Trump, citing court’s sexual abuse finding in Carroll case81·1 year agoI asked you to leave me alone, now you’ve responded 4 times to the same comment? You don’t follow requests well, do you?
For anyone reading along:
This kid is commenting multiple times on several of my posts here, and seeking me out to do so- yet I’m a “stalker.” Word of warning: avoid this guy. Because this is what you’ll have to deal with if you don’t.
You know… one doesn’t need to be diabetic to feel better from cutting sugar from their diet.
Pratai@lemmy.cato politics @lemmy.world•Romney rules out voting for Trump, citing court’s sexual abuse finding in Carroll case17·1 year agoAhh. You mean that right-wing attempt to accuse Biden of exactly what Trump did as a distraction from his own guilt? The woman that lied under oath? The woman whose own lawyers dropped her because she couldn’t get her facts straight?
Look man. I’m not arguing with you about this. So I honestly don’t care about what you respond with. You’re a right-wing troll that defends the J6 attacks. I and everyone you discuss anything is aware of this. No one here takes you seriously.
So how about you stop trolling me- and walk away from this.
And before you begin telling me to block you, that’s not happening. Your’re not blocked on this acct so I can warn others about what you do.
So…how about instead you try and work up the maturity it takes normal adults to just…. Maybe, not talk to someone that has asked you to leave them alone.
Further harassment will result in my reporting you to the admins.
deleted by creator