• usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    yes they were colonised and France did brutal things there but the French don’t live their now while Americans displaced the natives and now live where they used to. Which is a limitation of the term settlers as the French by and large didn’t settle the lands they took beyond soldiers and administrators most of whom considered their true homes to be in France and returned there once they were done leaving another Frenchman behind to live where they used to

        • Chapo_is_Red [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          I get what you mean, but I don’t think the difference is slight. Like, Algeria is fucked up by the French. Billions in wealth stolen, millions killed, culture destroyed, even today French is still a main language.

          But that’s no where near the degree to what happened in NA. Indigenous language barely exist, indigenous “sovereignty” is completely controlled thru the colonizers, and (obviously) most of the people in NA aren’t indigenous whereas most folks in Algeria are Algerian

          More importantly, it creates a different relationship to imperialism today (hence neocolonial versus settler colonial)