“Read Settlers” isn’t a fucking argument, and neither is repeating conclusions as dogma. You have no leg to stand on, just some convictions that even if they are correct, would only be correct by coincidence because you refuse to engage with the actual argument.
I didn’t detect any argument from you either, just a bunch of baseless claims about how Americans are apparently spiritually incapable of revolution. If you’re not presenting an argument, why would I bother debunking it?
No arguments left, then. Cool.
“Read Settlers” isn’t a fucking argument, and neither is repeating conclusions as dogma. You have no leg to stand on, just some convictions that even if they are correct, would only be correct by coincidence because you refuse to engage with the actual argument.
I didn’t detect any argument from you either, just a bunch of baseless claims about how Americans are apparently spiritually incapable of revolution. If you’re not presenting an argument, why would I bother debunking it?
Why would I need to present a new argument when the only argument anyone like I would ever need has been presented already. Read Settlers.
Recommending a book is not presenting an argument. It’s just admitting you can’t make a point on its own merits. You’re bad at this.