Distinction without a difference. They are fools who refuse to embrace the necessity of authoritarian socialism because it would make them personally uncomfortable and cling to the bourgois lie of democracy. No love.
the other does not but has the wrong approach to ending it
Which means they prop up capitalism. Again, these are comfortable first worlders who don’t want too much change to happen too fast lest their own standard of living is impacted, when a real socialist analysis would reveal the plain truth that the living standard of the first world MUST be decreased.
No man. Every single person on the planet who isn’t part of your specific ideological tendency is not “propping up capitalism”. This is not a useful attitude, they are not enemies whereas the socdems are.
Socdems are not the same thing as demsocs.
Distinction without a difference. They are fools who refuse to embrace the necessity of authoritarian socialism because it would make them personally uncomfortable and cling to the bourgois lie of democracy. No love.
There is a very clear distinction. One supports capitalism and the other does not but has the wrong approach to ending it.
Which means they prop up capitalism. Again, these are comfortable first worlders who don’t want too much change to happen too fast lest their own standard of living is impacted, when a real socialist analysis would reveal the plain truth that the living standard of the first world MUST be decreased.
No man. Every single person on the planet who isn’t part of your specific ideological tendency is not “propping up capitalism”. This is not a useful attitude, they are not enemies whereas the socdems are.