Context

Didn’t really have high hopes for this instance to begin with , but expected a lil better than this . Got called transphobe for this . Place’s a boy’s club thru & thru

And not to go into details about my personal life but , am genuinely triggered by these types of dudes that believe this bollocks . Unreal


Detailed explanation of wy trans(misandry|androphobia) dœsn’t exist :

Question: “If transmisogyny exists, does transmisandry?”

Answer: Based on the ways I have seen transmisandry commonly defined, I would say no. Firstly, misandry as a form of systemic oppression does not exist — trans men are not discriminated against for being men, but for being trans. Secondly, transmascs do face a specific type of transphobia, but transphobia is not unique to transmascs, while transmisogyny (which is not transphobia) is unique to transfems. Simply put, transmisogyny is the culturally pervasive attitude (held and perpetuated by anyone who is not a transfem) of regarding trans women as a third class of gendered categorization altogether, because, to quote myself, “[transmisogynists] cannot dignify us as women, but cannot accurately misgender us as men either without calling the stability of male supremacy into question.” (This process is called “third-gendering” or “degendering,” and you can read more about it here.) Therefore, transmisogyny operates on a different level of gendered oppression altogether. Again, transmascs do face a specific type of transphobia unique to them, but they do not experience quite the same form of marginalization which trans women do.

https://transmisogyny-explained.carrd.co/

  • Icytrees@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    This is wrong on so many levels you have to be trolling.

    The women’s liberation movement was a feminist movement. Feminism is the ideology behind women’s liberation, and has never been about attacking men or women. The people who claim they’re feminists but strive for equality by stepping on someone’s back are not following feminist ideology.

    Now, feminism is more focused on intersectionality than it has ever been, working toward equality across age, race, gender, nationality, religion and ability. There has never been a feminist movement that took into account the issues men face under a patriarchy as much as modern day feminism.

    • Oberyn@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The people who claim they’re feminists but strive for equality by stepping on someone’s back are not following feminist ideology.

      Women are allowed to feel whatever way they want about men bcus they’re the ones targeted by misogyny , with men being the benefactors

      • Icytrees@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        People can feel whatever they want, yes. If those feelings lead to hurting another group out of revenge, it’s not feminism. Human rights are not a limited resource.

        If you believe in undertaking revenge against men because misogyny exists, I don’t want to engage in that conversation. It’s not going to be productive for either of us.

    • mistermodal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      Nope of course I’m not trolling this is a serious issue, and I’d be happy to support jt in a longer post tomorrow when I am more alert by quoting bell hooks etc