• rose56@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    They don’t like it now, do they? Fuck Moscow for real, life is not a game where you always win.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    imagine the morale at the orc camps when oil refineries take priority over your life and your operations

  • greygore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Images shared online show the system with only two of the standard six launch missiles pictured on one side, suggesting there may be a shortage of interceptors.

    This feels significant for something buried at the end of the article.

    • Bluewing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      And now you know why the west is frantically working on laser based systems for shooting down drones. They are claiming literally “pennies per shot.”

    • manxu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah. The Ukrainians are masterfully playing the economics of it. Shooting down drones that cost a tenth of an interceptor is ineffective. It’s downright ruinous if Ukraine sends hundreds of drones a day. If the sky around Moscow is saturated with interceptions, there will be none left for the front lines, where they actually would make a military difference.

      The Iranians have been playing a similar game with Trump. So much so that, to nobody’s surprise, the leaders of the Gulf states invited Zelenskyy to offer drone interception tech instead of Hegseth.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Don’t they have gun AA systems as well though? Wouldn’t they be more effective against drones or are the radars unsuitable for the small targets.

        Not sure if the Gepard required modifications or not to target drones, thought I had heard it could do a pretty good job at taking them out if it’s at range. Probably not so much if there is uneven terrain for the drones to move through.

          • jrs100000@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Also spraying thousands of large caliber bullets a minute into the air isn’t a great idea in a populated area around the capital. They might hit somebody important.

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Eh they likely don’t need to. Just retake other land and let them go thirsty in Crimea for now.

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Lmao

    Russia actually primed to lose this entire war.

    Do we expect any territory boundaries to be redrawn eastwards soon?

    • zabadoh@ani.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Keeping Putin safe is the only thing that matters.

      Send people to the front line to be killed. No big deal.

      Destroy the economy. So what?

      None of that matters as long as Putin feels safe.

        • The_v@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Ukraine is working on completely cutting off the southern front from supply routes. Eventually the troops along the southern front are going to suffer from lack of supplies. Without food, ammo etc, they will be have to retreat back or be easily overrun in their weakened state. Crimea is being cut off so that if the Russian troops retreat, they head east not south.

          It’s not going to happen immediately, but if Ukraine keeps up the current pressure by this fall might be very interesting.