• SmoothOperator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      233
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s base 20 like in France, plus the quirk that we have an ordinal numeral way of saying half integers, i.e. 1.5 is “half second”, 2.5 is “half third”, 4.5 is “half fifth”. So 92 is said as “two and half fifth times twenty”. We’ve since made the “times twenty” implicit for maximum confusion, so it’s just said as “two and half fifths”.

      Also, the ordinal numeral system for halves is only really used for 1.5 these days, so the numbers don’t really make sense to anyone. When speaking to other Scandinavians, we often just say “nine ten two”.

      Why don’t we just change it to the more sensible system then? Because language is stubborn.

      • sturlabragason@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        104
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Now imagine moving there as a foreigner from a normal country and someone telling you their phone number! It’s like having a micro stroke.

      • federalreverse-old@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        1.5 is “half second”, 2.5 is “half third”, 4.5 is “half fifth”

        Interesting. Regionally, some Germans measure time like this, i.e. “half two” is 01:30 resp. 13:30. (Which is different from English, where people who say “half two” mean “half past two”.)

        We’ve since made the “times twenty” implicit for maximum confusion, so it’s just said as “two and half fifths”.

        I know very little about Danish, but I learned that Danes slur the middle of most words. So I suspect you actually pronounce even less of the word than you’d write…?

        Because language is stubborn.

        Belgian French gives me hope.

        [Edited: Usage is not regional]

        • lugal@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          Regionally, some Germans measure time like this, i.e. “half two” is 01:30 resp. 13:30.

          This isn’t regional nor “some”, I never met a German wo doesn’t. Sure, there is “13 o’clock 30” and both are valid but I’d say the default is still the half system.

          When it comes to quarters, there are regional differences and it’s a common “ice breaker” or small talk topic when people from all over Germany come together.

        • SmoothOperator@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          When we say “half two” we also mean 13:30. It’s a pain when in Britain.

          And yeah, I guess in pronouncing you’d say 92 as “to’å’l’fems” rather than “to-og-halv-fems”.

        • bstix@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s pronounced “toh-år-hal-fems”.

          That’s 3 syllables, because the first two are glissando, but even the most rural person needs some consonants between the rest to make any sense.

        • sqw@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve run into Americans for whom “half two” means 13:30. I like it but it confuses everyone.

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        So the Danish can do this bullshit with everyday numbers and it’s cool because language , but I mention that it’s 70 degrees outside and everyone starts arguing about metric?

        Everything is arbitrary, I’m gonna go build a dresser in multiples of rabbit foot while you all figure something out.

        • DepressedCoconut@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          Danish people are environmentally damaged by the flatness of their country and the rest of Scandinavia pitty them. We will take care of this. We will teach them how to speak. Soonish.

        • Drigo@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          When we talk with other people in fx English we use their numbering system, and not our own

        • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Temperature in fahrenheit is just as arbitrary as celsius. Fahrenheit makes sense from the perspective of human experience while celsius is very relevant to water. It’s really handy if you live in a area with snowy winters. Celsius is standard all around the world, while Fahrenheit is used in a handful of places.

      • champagne_laugh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        And to confuse even further, the cardinal number (ninety-two) is “to-og-halv-fems” in Danish without the *20. But if you need the ordinal number (92nd), then we add in the x20 as in “to-og-halv-fem-sinds-tyvende”. Danish is very easy and transparent 😊

        • Kale@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          For what it’s worth, the US doesn’t use imperial anymore. It’s “US Customary Units”. It’s mostly a mix of metric and units based on metric. The US uses volts, amps, watts, and seconds which are metric. The inch, by definition, is 25.4mm. I’m not sure how the US gallon (less volume than the Imperial gallon) is defined. Food content is given in calories and grams.

          I’m also not sure how temperature is defined. Originally, temperature units were set so that fresh water boiled exactly 180 degrees above it’s freezing temperature. To avoid negative numbers, zero Fahrenheit was set to the freezing temperature of sea ice.

          • Latecoere@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            US doesn’t use imperial anymore.

            They never did to begin with. US customary units descend from older English customary units. During the 19th century the British government redefined some things in some weights and measures acts and that was called the Imperial system because of the British Empire. US never used Imperial as they were happy doing their own independent shit.

            US customary and Imperial units differed a bit until the 20th century. In the 30s there was an ‘industrial’ inch agreed upon, the 25.4mm as you said, but weights still differed. In the 50s there was a conference where the US, UK and some commonwealth countries agreed upon a standardised international yard and pound, the international yard being 0.9144 meters and the international pound 0.45359237 kilograms, defined in metric as you said. Liquid measures were not standardised for some reason so US and Imperial gallons still differ.

            The formal definition of Fahrenheit is based on Kelvin these days.

      • joneskind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I have to admit, as a French myself I found relief in that discovery. And thank you very much for the explanation.

        I was confused by the “2 and” at first, then I realize you put the smallest part of the whole number first. It makes perfectly sense if you count in base 20.

        We also have an habit to count in base 12 and half 12 in France. Like “half a dozen” (6) or “one dozen and half” (18), but only for multiple of 6.

        I will now say “quatre vingtaine et demie” instead of “quatre-vingt-dix” just to tease my fellow Belgians (who say “nonante” and “septante” instead of “soixante-dix” et “quatre-vingt-dix”)

        EDIT: As a matter of fact, I will rather say “trois et demi-cinquième vingt” for 73 because it sounds better. Now I see it.

        If I am correct, the 3rd 20 is everything between 60 and 79. The half-3rd 20 is everything between 70 and 79. So 7 and half-2nd 20 would be 37?

        How would you say 40, 60 and 80 then ? 2nd 20, 3rd 20 and 4th 20?

        • Serdan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The weird numbers only start at 50.

          60: tre sinde tyve ( three times twenty).
          80: fire sinde tyve ( four times twenty)

        • SmoothOperator@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Indeed, fyrre (40) is also clearly related to four (or fourth), it only kicks in at 50.

          You can recognize the numbers where this system is in place by the ‘s’ at the end, which is a remnant of the “-sindstyve” ending meaning “times twenty”.

          If it worked for 30 and 40 they would be “halvandens” and “andens”.

      • MartinXYZ@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve always found the Danish numbers intriguing. I understand the whole “halvfem-sinds-tyve”- thing and the other ones of similar origin but I can’t wrap my head around “elleve” and “tolv”. Do you remember the origin of those?

        • SmoothOperator@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not really, but they’re essentially the same as the German “elf” and “zwölf”, so we probably got them from the same place as them ;)

          • vidarh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wiktionary suggests the common proto-Germanic root of eleven/twelve, elf/zwölf are likely to have been “ainalif” and “twalif” - “one left over” and “two left over”.

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      # 🇩🇰
      1 en
      2 to
      3 tre
      4 fire
      5 fem
      6 seks
      7 syv
      8 otte
      9 ni
      10 ti
      11 elleve
      12 tolv
      13 tretten
      14 fjorten
      15 femten
      16 seksten
      17 sytten
      18 atten
      19 nitten
      20 tyve
      21 enogtyve
      22 toogtyve
      30 tredive
      40 fyrre
      50 halvtreds
      60 tres (threes)
      70 halvfjerds (½fourths)
      80 firs (fours)
      90 halvfems (½fifths)
      92 tooghalvfems (twoand½fifths)
      100 hundred

      In Czech, we say „čtvrt na osm“ (quarter to eight), „půl osmé“ (half of eighth) and „tři čtvrtě na osm“ (¾ to eight) to mean 19:15, 19:30 and 19:45, respectively, so I kinda get it.
      Similarly, in German, 🕢=„halb acht“.

      • Bruno@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        TIL that it not French with the weirdest way to count. I still don’t really get the Danish way. Even with your explanation.

        • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not really an explanation, just a table where I leave the linguistically inclined to figure it out. The point is, the “s” at the end is short for “×20” and “half fifth” is short for ●●●●◖ = 4½ (four and half of the fifth).

            • abecede@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Maybe the Danish don’t just count with their fingers to 10, but include their toes… So 10 fingers + 10 toes = 20?

              • vidarh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                "Four score and seven years ago"‍ from the Gettysburg Address… Many languages have or had words for counting in 20’s. They’ve just mostly gone out of fashion.

      • thelastknowngod@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Funny enough, I grew up saying “quarter of eight” to mean 19:45. It took until my mid-20s to realize its probably a regional thing because, after I left Philadelphia (my home city) and moved to Chicago, everyone thought I meant 20:15.

        • Vacationlandgirl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Oh! In New England “quarter of” is 15 minutes before the hour (19:45) and “quarter after” is 15 minutes after the hour (20:15). That might explain why my colleagues in Alabama were surprised when I left a meeting at 9:45 when I had clearly warned them I had a hard stop at quarter of ten!

          Interesting distinction none of us picked up on!

      • Uncle_Bagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thats pretty common in terms of time. I’m not going to say something is “half five” to say it coststwo and a half dollars though. I understand that with French and Danish you arent actually doing the math and just think of that string the same way i think of “ninety two” but it’s still difficult to wrap my head around.

        • Bumblefumble@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just to make something clear, in this system, which isn’t really used, half five would be 4.5, not 2.5.