“Experts in Europe warn that these devices are used to record strangers without their consent, possibly breaching EU law.”

“A small LED light is designed to indicate when recording is taking place, but RTBF’s investigators found that tutorials explaining how to conceal the indicator are abundant and easily accessible online.”

Sometimes I have a hard time deciding who I despise more, parasite Mark Zuckerberg or its witless hosts who keep using its products—yes, Zuck’s pronoun is it. Ban Ray-Ban, for frick’s sake.

  • billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I understand how creepy this is but why is this any different than the 1000s of cameras on poles literally everywhere these days. Neither of these should be acceptable

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because somehow those recordings being misused is less offensive than these recordings being misused.

      Honestly, the privacy aspect in public is completely out the window already. Anyone arguing that these are somehow worse than what already exists is either arguing in bad faith or misunderstands the current (previous?) state of things.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        They’re not worse, but having yet another thing invading our privacy in public IS worse. No sense in giving up even more ground.

        • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          invading our privacy in public

          Stop and think about what you just said for a second. Privacy……in public. You have no privacy in public, those are opposites.

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            There’s degrees of privacy. People don’t deserve to be recorded 24/7 just because they happen to be outside.

            • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              They don’t “deserve” to, but it is not illegal if they are. If you’re in a public space you shouldn’t expect privacy……because you’re in a public place. That’s pretty obvious.

              • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Something being legal doesn’t make it morally correct and the rest of us should oppose this shit in every way we can, not simply expect it.

                • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Oppose what, that you can be filmed or photographed without explicit consent when you’re in public?

                  So if I go to the Eiffel Tower, I have to go and ask the hundreds of other people there if they consent to me taking their photo simply because they’re in my photo? Or if I see a criminal breaking into a house, I have to ask them if I can take their photo/video if I want to report them and hand over my photos/video to the police?

                  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Snapping a photo or video of your family or a landmark for your personal memories that happens to have some other people in the background is a hell of a lot different than sending a constant stream of everyone you’re looking at along with location data to Facebook, Google, the government, and whoever the fuck else. I shouldn’t have to explain this to you. And yes if you’re going to be uploading someones image online I do think you should have their permission.

                  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    creeps.

                    the same creeps who can’t understand what the problem is. creeps filming women and girls without permission or consent.

                    creeps like you apparently.