WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.net to Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-22 months agoassigning unimpeachable veracity to a document that makes a point to refer to one of its subjects as a "biological male," for what clearly must be no purpose at allhexbear.netimagemessage-square96linkfedilinkarrow-up1127arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1127arrow-down1imageassigning unimpeachable veracity to a document that makes a point to refer to one of its subjects as a "biological male," for what clearly must be no purpose at allhexbear.netWhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.net to Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-22 months agomessage-square96linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareinTheShadowOf [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·2 months agoWell fair enough then, but you’re still incredibly rude lol. I’d also like to point out that assuming someone must be a tttt poster probably doesn’t feel good to that poster either!! Maybe don’t jump to that next time
Well fair enough then, but you’re still incredibly rude lol.
I’d also like to point out that assuming someone must be a tttt poster probably doesn’t feel good to that poster either!! Maybe don’t jump to that next time