WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.net to Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-22 months agoassigning unimpeachable veracity to a document that makes a point to refer to one of its subjects as a "biological male," for what clearly must be no purpose at allhexbear.netimagemessage-square96linkfedilinkarrow-up1127arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1127arrow-down1imageassigning unimpeachable veracity to a document that makes a point to refer to one of its subjects as a "biological male," for what clearly must be no purpose at allhexbear.netWhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.net to Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-22 months agomessage-square96linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareAssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·2 months agoOnce again repeating my point that it’s weird people talk about these major court cases as if the prosecution is 100% correct. I sure hope no one on Hexbear dot net sits on the jury of a significant case involving the state lmao
minus-squareNewAcctWhoDis [any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 months ago sorry sweaty that’s witness tampering
Once again repeating my point that it’s weird people talk about these major court cases as if the prosecution is 100% correct. I sure hope no one on Hexbear dot net sits on the jury of a significant case involving the state lmao
sorry sweaty that’s witness tampering