• callouscomic@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 个月前

    This is one of many reasons I don’t buy textbook economics of capitalism.

    For example, if they’d just put lots of pockets in women’s clothing decades ago as standard, they’d have sold SOOOO much.

    This idea that capitalism and the free hand of the market will gravitate towards bulk of demand is bullshit.

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 个月前

      Unfortunately, I’m pretty sure that this is one instance that validates the textbook approach. In addition to the comment here, I had read several on the red site several years ago, one I remember from a buyer for a chain of outdoor gear stores, and another from the owner of a boutique clothing store. Both said that they tried to get women’s clothing with real pockets, but eventually gave up because it just doesn’t sell.

      This topic came up in a group of my sailor friends on a boat last week, and ironically, all of the women’s garments had good pockets, so they couldn’t provide an example. But then, they were all wearing utilitarian clothing, rather than stylish. One friend had just bought new pants from REI; I’ve noticed for decades that if you want real pockets, shop at REI.

      For what it’s worth, stylish, form-fitting men’s clothing also has tiny, or no pockets.