ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agoInheritancelemmy.curiana.netimagemessage-square35linkfedilinkarrow-up1776arrow-down12
arrow-up1774arrow-down1imageInheritancelemmy.curiana.netExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square35linkfedilink
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 months agoI didn’t think COBOL had inheritance.
minus-squarezqwzzle@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·2 months agoHence the roundabout route I guess. Programmers really should stop using it. https://xkcd.com/583/
minus-squarebitchkat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoFor some reason, COBOL has had OOP features since 2002.
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months ago For some reason It’s because “every language must do OOP”. Every SQL engine does it… SWI Prolog seems to have escaped, but COBOL had no chance.
I didn’t think COBOL had inheritance.
Hence the roundabout route I guess. Programmers really should stop using it. https://xkcd.com/583/
For some reason, COBOL has had OOP features since 2002.
It’s because “every language must do OOP”.
Every SQL engine does it… SWI Prolog seems to have escaped, but COBOL had no chance.
Carlos!