ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agoInheritancelemmy.curiana.netimagemessage-square35linkfedilinkarrow-up1776arrow-down12
arrow-up1774arrow-down1imageInheritancelemmy.curiana.netExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square35linkfedilink
minus-squarebitchkat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoFor some reason, COBOL has had OOP features since 2002.
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months ago For some reason It’s because “every language must do OOP”. Every SQL engine does it… SWI Prolog seems to have escaped, but COBOL had no chance.
For some reason, COBOL has had OOP features since 2002.
It’s because “every language must do OOP”.
Every SQL engine does it… SWI Prolog seems to have escaped, but COBOL had no chance.