• manxu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Alright, I hear you, but I think the point is that a cyclist running a red light mostly endangers themselves, while a car running a red light endangers others. Here in Colorado, we changed the laws such that a red light is a stop sign for bicycles, and a stop sign a yield, in recognition of the differences in risk. (Edit: cars -> bicycles)

      • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I would argue a stop sign is car infrastructure.

        Did we have stop signs before cars started to fill up our city streets?

    • JustinTheGM@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s assuming that an oncoming car wouldn’t swerve at all if a cyclist entered their path. Dangerous or unpredictable behavior by anyone on a road puts everyone in the area at risk.