Of course being pro genocide lost Harris votes. The DNC is fine with Republicans (including Trump) winning so long as they can preclude the left, which is the actual purpose of the Democratic party. Most of the base will happily be useful idiots and spend their energy punching left rather than allow any criticism of the party, all the while calling the left naive and blaming them for losing elections.
What is that even supposed to mean? You people are so fucking random. Why don’t you get a hobby or something, you have too much of your personality vested in being straight up obnoxious and hating others. I know- go join MAGA, they love people like you.
Fun fact: everyone who doesn’t support the exact amount of genocide Harris did is actually a Russian. Especially if they’re spewing bullshit like “that crosses a line” or “Jesus Christ it’s literally genocide”.
Oh my friend, you read like an undercover right-wing plant. It’s fairly obvious to anyone with a conscience that genocide is the simplest and most important issue that a candidate could fuck up. And Harris did that.
Let’s compare issues. I would say that on various issues (immigration, defense spending, health care) her stances were certainly not left-wing. Center, center-right, pro-corporate, that’s what I would say. And these are important issues. But I think it’s also true that she could have maintained many of those stances and still win. After all, previous Democrat presidents did.
If you’re afraid to say that genocide is wrong, and actively work to stop it, you deserve to lose.
It’s not even just genocide, it’s trust. Exactly how much trust should we put in a candidate who participated in supporting and covering for a genocide? Sure, she aligns with my issues slightly more than Trump. What good is that if she’s a liar too? It’s no damn wonder people didn’t show up to vote.
Of course being pro genocide lost Harris votes. The DNC is fine with Republicans (including Trump) winning so long as they can preclude the left, which is the actual purpose of the Democratic party. Most of the base will happily be useful idiots and spend their energy punching left rather than allow any criticism of the party, all the while calling the left naive and blaming them for losing elections.
Removed by mod
I dunno, maybe we should have an election to see. Oh, wait, we did. I guess you have your answer. So what should the Democrats do about that?
Field a candidate which is not evil?!
If they want to they’re the solution for the problem of their own making.
Removed by mod
the brave pro genocide democrat lol, you people deserve a century of humiliation
Is almost been 250 years actually
Yeah I’m for pedophilia and rape too. Nice talking to you, Soviet Robot.
To be fair, you kinda have to be to support the IDF.
Yea i can tell https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relationship_of_Bill_Clinton_and_Jeffrey_Epstein
What is that even supposed to mean? You people are so fucking random. Why don’t you get a hobby or something, you have too much of your personality vested in being straight up obnoxious and hating others. I know- go join MAGA, they love people like you.
Calls others bots, cant imagine people being able to do more than 2 things at the same time.
Blue MAGA proving they arent too different from their brothers in red
Removed by mod
God, I wish I were called Soviet Robot too, that sounds pretty fucking epic
I can get disgusted by genocide all by myself.
Removed by mod
Fun fact: everyone who doesn’t support the exact amount of genocide Harris did is actually a Russian. Especially if they’re spewing bullshit like “that crosses a line” or “Jesus Christ it’s literally genocide”.
Is the right wing push in the room with us now?
Removed by mod
🪞
How dare you spread that pedophile propaganda in here! I never…
Amazing.
Removed by mod
🪞
Oh my friend, you read like an undercover right-wing plant. It’s fairly obvious to anyone with a conscience that genocide is the simplest and most important issue that a candidate could fuck up. And Harris did that.
Let’s compare issues. I would say that on various issues (immigration, defense spending, health care) her stances were certainly not left-wing. Center, center-right, pro-corporate, that’s what I would say. And these are important issues. But I think it’s also true that she could have maintained many of those stances and still win. After all, previous Democrat presidents did.
If you’re afraid to say that genocide is wrong, and actively work to stop it, you deserve to lose.
It’s not even just genocide, it’s trust. Exactly how much trust should we put in a candidate who participated in supporting and covering for a genocide? Sure, she aligns with my issues slightly more than Trump. What good is that if she’s a liar too? It’s no damn wonder people didn’t show up to vote.