• floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    So never buy OnePlus products. Got it. Thanks OnePlus for making the advice so clear!

      • Armand1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Samsung has been blowing fuses in your phone when you root since at least 2015. I know because it happened to me. Never bought one again after that.

        • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yep, Samsung Knox is the feature name; does it actually prevent things or is it just “tamper evidence” for corporate devices?

          • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            According to the linked article it prevents the use of Samsung Pay and access to the Secure Folder (an extra layer of security you can enable that requires a second PIN to be input before you can access certain apps and files). This seems pretty reasonable, the goal is clearly to prevent access to especially sensitive data if someone has stolen the phone.

            • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              It’s not reasonable in my opinion.

              I can maybe understand not wanting other operating systems in their attestation chain that is protecting a payment system from the standpoint of liability.

              All of the other things are entirely hardware features that any OS should be able to use. They’re using the ARM Trusted Execution Environment (ARM TrustZone) and a embedded Secure Element to enable the ability to store cryptographiclly secured files without the system ever having access to the keys.

              Both TEEs and eSEs are not a Samsung invention or IP and are enabled by hardware on the device, the TEE is part of the ARM standard and is used in a huge number of other OSs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture_family). Secure Elements are also widely used pieces of hardware supported by innumerable OSs and also a feature of the hardware that you paid for.

              • PhoenixAlpha@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                GrapheneOS also claims it’s not defending against anything real. Which makes sense as Pixels can clearly maintain security while allowing alternate OSes. So this is just hostile vendor lock-in. Disappointing as there was some speculation that OP would be the GOS OEM, but there’s no way they would do this is that was true.

  • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    OnePlus is a Chinese company. Anybody who trusted a Chinese company to respect privacy, consumer rights, and ownership freedom is a complete idiot.

  • Mycenaman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s not flashing a custom ROM. It is installing an OS of users choice. Enemy’s language shouldn’t be used if we want things to change

      • Mycenaman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        What makes it “custom”? If you install Linux on a laptop that comes with Windows pre-installed, is Linux then a custom OS it’s not being a default? Why phones are any different? Calling it custom you play to the manufacturers pockets making it sound shady and unofficial giving them right to take the control from the customers devices. Soon we won’t own anything we buy.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          To me it feels more like a full appliance as it’s not even intended primarily to install anything else.
          But I can also see your point as a valid argument.

        • herrvogel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Because for phones they kinda are custom. The smartphone hardware landscape is an absolute clusterfuck of proprietary blobs and closed source drivers and all sorts of shit that makes it so you need a lot of work to customize the base os to work on any particular device. ROMs have rather short lists of compatible phones, and each one of those had to have a build specifically developed for them. You can’t take, say, grapheneos and slap it on any phone you like.

          • Mycenaman@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            The same applies to every pre-installed OS. They are all customized from AOSP, but only third-party operating systems are called such. That was my point there.

  • stebator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Many users were buying OpenPlus Pro smartphones solely because of the ability to unlock the bootloader and flash custom ROMs. People value freedom and customization. OpenPlus is shooting itself in the foot.

  • lonesomeCat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Seriously are there any Android brands that do not suck and ship everywhere (not limited to the US/EU markets)??

    • Limonene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I believe thay all have shitty operating systems. But some of them have an aftermarket OS available. Pick your OS first, then look for a phone that can run it. Here are the ones I know of:

      GrapheneOS

      CalyxOS (on hiatus)

      Crdriod

      LineageOS

    • eru@mouse.chitanda.moe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      google pixel with grapheneos maybe

      pixel 10 is pretty repairable hardware wise, some prior ones have glued in battery

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t know why this thread is complaining specifically about Chinese OEMs when Samsung has been doing this for years.

  • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I bought a OP 9Pro just before Oppo decimated the company. They moved from Oxygen OS to a poorly camouflaged version of Oppo Color OS and stripped out some of the features that made Oneplus what it was. Oppo also almost completely stopped fixing bugs, even some really serious ones that had been long documented. I recently bought a new phone and didn’t even consider Oneplus Oppo.

    It seems to me that the only reason Oppo would do this is to preserve the revenue they get from selling customer data that should remain private. Otherwise why would Oppo care what OS people run on their hardware?

    • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Hi, could you share what phone you bought? I’m looking for a replacement in the near future and I want to get a headstart on the research.

      • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Bought a Pixel 10. After the last few days I’d only give it a C- review. Google uses their customers as beta testers and leaves all kinds of ridiculous bugs for their customers to deal with. The hardware is nice overall, but Android 16 needs lots of work. This is probably the reason so many Google employees refuse to use Android and buy Iphones.

        The bugs Google has knowingly released include a broken volume control that requires the screen to be unlocked and the application be open for some applications, sleep schedules not working reliably, “helpful” nags ignoring the sleep schedule and waking me up in the middle of the night. Last night it was their “Find Hub” (renamed from “Find my Device” for some reason) waking me at 1:30AM to let me know I should set it up. A week ago it was my phone warning me at 3AM that Location was turned off and Accident Detection would not work. There have been more and right now I’m wishing I bought an Iphone. Google doesn’t deserve our business.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    That means they were making money by people running their os.

    If they spend the money on re-engineering their devices not to allow it, there was a cost advantage to selling your data.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    And yet my LinkedIn is still full of people complaining about how much the EU over-regulates

  • ramble81@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Holy shit. I wanted to say something constructive, but just…. holy shit. Intentional hard brick of a customer owned device….

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    If true, this is sabotage of the customers product, and must 100% be illegal in almost any country!!
    But my guess is they are limiting this to countries that have absolute shit consumer protection.

    • db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Things are illegal only when enforced. Otherwise they’re a suggestion at best.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s part of how shitty the consumer protection really is.
        But common for all, there needs to be complaints before the law is involved.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        So are console sold with the possibility of changing the OS, only to have that option removed later? There was some issue with PS3, but apart from that I never heard about it.

        • SolSerkonos@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Ooooh, okay, now I understand. I was referring to the way modern consoles blow a fuse with each new patch so you can’t load older patches.

          But yeah, the PS3 removed the ability to boot Linux which it was explicitly advertised to have and it was a huge thing at the time.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            consoles blow a fuse with each new patch so you can’t load older patches.

            Admittedly I was unaware of this, but for consoles it can have a real functional purpose as part of the protection against cheating.

            • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              No, this is done to ensure there’s no competition when selling games. Why do you think console games are pricier than PC ones? On PC we still have some competition.