1. You love giving your data away
  2. You enjoy being tracked by your operating system
  3. You’re happy when your computer tells you “no”
  4. You prefer someone else deciding what you can run
  5. You feel uncomfortable if you get to have options
  6. You’d rather battle corporate tech support
  7. You’d rather rent your software than own it
  8. You think ads belong on your desktop
  9. You love being lied to about what’s “industry standard”
  10. You like rebooting for every little update
  11. You’re uncomfortable when software is transparent
  12. You think community-made tools can’t be “professional”
  13. You want intrusive AI everywhere, whether it helps or not
  14. You think the command line is only for hackers
  15. You never really wanted your computer to be yours anyway
  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This is exactly the kind of shit that keeps people from switching to Linux y’all know that right?

    • vandsjov@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, I read this as: YOU ARE FUCKING STUPID, I AM MUCH BETTER THAN YOU

      That is really a good way to communicate.

    • Helix 🧬@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Why should I care? Linux has enough users as it is, development is sustainable. I don’t want all users to switch at once because that would flood forums with noobs asking silly questions.

      It’s their loss if they don’t use Linux. Why should I encourage them to do so? Just to have some shitty Electron apps more which I don’t use?

      It’s much more painful for me that the places I work at don’t use Linux. They won’t be swayed by such an article anyway.

      • pineapple@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Are you serious? Do you really believe linux can’t get any better or that linux is perfect for you?

        The more people that use linux the more donations it gets from people and the more people use it.

        Also if you think linux is so awesome isn’t it nice to other people to share that awesomeness with them?

        As well the more people that use linux the more apps will be supported on it. Can you say with full confidence that there isn’t a single windows or macos app that doesn’t work perfectly on linux that you don’t want? Even if linux is perfect for you, you rely on the kindness of open source maintainers to maintain linux, can you really not reserve any kindness for other people?

  • Cris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    As a long time linux user, antagonizing people who are unsure if the switch is right for them is very clearly a poor interpersonal choice that will not result in the change we wanna see in the world, or more people adopting linux

    Fuckin seriously, we can do better than this circle jerk. As someone who cares deeply about software being kinder to people it pains me enormously how much of a dump stat interpersonal skills are for so much of the Foss community

    If the authors wanna pat themselves for linux they can do it without creating a unempathetic, condescending, preachy culture that alienates people.

    Just call the article “things we love about having switched to linux” so it finds the right audience and its fine, but this shit sucks and its exactly the kind of crap that has made so many of my friends resistant to hearing what I think is good and special about Foss software. They hear me out anyway, but I’d love for it to not be a fucking uphill battle because Foss people routinely emulate the same preachy, condescending, unempathetic interpersonal apprach that everyone bemoans about the worst vegan spaces online

  • onlooker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    And here I was, thinking this was a well thought out article with actual, legitimate reasons why someone wouldn’t want to use Linux. Instead, it’s this smug, autofellating, condescending bullshit. Roland Taylor has some issues.

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Oh, it’s just a list of pro Linux items but in reverse psychology… Kay.

    I’m already a Linux user, I was kinda curious about a listing of actual reasons Linux might not be for someone.

    • ozymandias@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      actual reasons:

      1. want to use some specific program or game only available for another os
      2. lazy, dumb or afraid of computer stuff.
      3. can’t decide from 10,000 different distributions
    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not just reverse psychology, I can’t imagine anyone agreeing with most of these. It’s definitely got a holier-than-thou attitude. Like who is this even written for other than people who already use Linux and just want to feel smugly superior?

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    “Well if you don’t buy this car you are a moron who can’t see how much better this car is. So keep driving that piece of shit car you dumbass. So, have I sold you on this car?”

  • tuff_wizard@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    If you have a job or are student you’ll know that using Linux usually results in a direct increase in corporate tech support battles.

  • boredsquirrel (he)@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Cool and all but stop the rebooting hate

    1. I just installed some random drivers, I guess without rebooting. Window is intransparent af, but I think so.
    2. Reboots are very important and should be done with updates. Atomic systems make sense!
  • muzzle@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Back on the 90s (I know, I know) the joke was that of your VCR was still blinking 12:00 Linux was probably not for you.

    • Inui [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Its nice that it doesnt pester you at all to reboot or threaten to do it for you though. I reboot maybe once a month to apply whatever updates came through since most of my stuff are flatpaks that get updated live anyway.

  • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Here’s a few more.

    1. You want to use multiple monitors without messing around.

    2. You don’t want to run an emulator for your games.

    3. You like being able to share software with people.

    4. You need corporate software for work or your own business.

    5. You’re looking for a computer that ‘just works’.

    • candyman337@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The monitor thing is very dependent on distro, I didn’t really have any issues at all with Linux mint or nobara

      As others have said wine/proton is not an emulator and some games run even better on Linux, that being said a lot of AAA games have DRM that prevent you from running them on Linux, that would be your real argument there

      Don’t like being able to share software? A ton of software on Linux is FOSS and available on windows, not all of it of course, but you could say the same about Mac

      Depending on the corporation and software, you can use Linux, but yes, most places are windows shops, so that is difficult

      But yeah,a computer that just “works” I concede most distros will not get you there. Nobara is definitely a bit unstable but I can deal with it because I was in IT for 6 years. Although immutable distros are close, but they definitely still take some knowhow to use, and have their limitations

      Edit: misread part of the comment

      • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        The first one is because at least on Mint, on the machine I have, multiple monitors just don’t work, and I’ve been told it’s not just me, it’s X11. The second is the need for Wine or Bottles (or whatever Valve has done).

        • Melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Wine literally stands for “WINE Is Not an Emulator”.

          That said, Proton is pretty transparent, you can just install any game off Steam right now and it’ll work 9 times out of 10 without you noticing that you’re using wine. I often can’t tell if I’m using proton or not and get surprised when I go into the game files for one reason or another expecting proton and am surprised to find a native Linux build. There has even been at least one time I’ve switched from a native Linux build to Proton because it ran better, and it was just one toggle.

          Why the resistance to wine? Did you have an issue while using it, or is it the principle of using a compatibility layer?

    • Goretantath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      A computer that “just works” nowadays is an android phone, windows has so much broken due to them replacing devs with AI that you can’t justify that as a reason nowadays.