Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.
Much of Marx, Engels, Stalin, Mao, and other diamat theorists’ writing is specifically written to attack the idealist/metaphysical world outlook. I think that it’s clear that they are making claims about the nature of reality, because the point of the philosophy falls a bit flat otherwise. But they’re also committed to ruthless criticism of their own ideas and (at least in the best case) improve the theory when new contradictions appear; I don’t think that it’s likely that revolutionary movements in the near future will change their philosophical positions to accommodate religious people, but I guess you’re also right that the usefulness of the model is really the only thing that has to be constant about it.
i see your point, i do think the Abrahamic idea of an omnibenevolent god runs into some contradictions and tensions with historical materialism. broader metaphysical questions about the ultimate nature of things i do still see as beyond its purview (even if the theorists themselves didn’t) but that’s a larger conversation.
Much of Marx, Engels, Stalin, Mao, and other diamat theorists’ writing is specifically written to attack the idealist/metaphysical world outlook. I think that it’s clear that they are making claims about the nature of reality, because the point of the philosophy falls a bit flat otherwise. But they’re also committed to ruthless criticism of their own ideas and (at least in the best case) improve the theory when new contradictions appear; I don’t think that it’s likely that revolutionary movements in the near future will change their philosophical positions to accommodate religious people, but I guess you’re also right that the usefulness of the model is really the only thing that has to be constant about it.
i see your point, i do think the Abrahamic idea of an omnibenevolent god runs into some contradictions and tensions with historical materialism. broader metaphysical questions about the ultimate nature of things i do still see as beyond its purview (even if the theorists themselves didn’t) but that’s a larger conversation.