• DarkWinterNights@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      While true, there is economy to the least awful option - by virtue of the USA making itself less reliable, they’ve increased China’s standing automatically, especially in the soft-power vacuum the US has left behind.

      China is right to calculate this, even if they aren’t really anyone’s ally.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 days ago

    To be perfectly blunt, I don’t think the presentation of a united front is the issue. The wariness is from China wanting to fill the power vacuum left by the US, and many countries being extremely wary of hitching their wagons to an authoritarian superpower (which is what the US is turning into, and one of the primary reasons outside of the tariff idiocy that a lot of countries are stepping away from the US now). And the PRC is absolutely an authoritarian superpower.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Yes, the EU and other alliances in general, and individual states specifically, need to reestablish technical and financial independence, and keep it. International alliance can and should also be made, with the goal of always, always guarding sovereignty at home.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Best case scenario at this point is that both China and the US are successful in neutering each other’s foreign power.

        A man can dream, right?

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        No… Other regions should have their own "E.U"s and all these should report up into one global collaborative assembly. To each their local governance and independence, under global coordination. It’s the only way.

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            So let each country be powerful enough to rule themselves. I don’t see the net benefit of having a single global “ruler.”

            • realitista@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              20 days ago

              No one ever said there’s a net benefit. It’s just what ends up happening one way or another. Achieving a perfect balance of power between every nation on the earth has never happened in history.

                • realitista@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  19 days ago

                  Someone will take that mantle. Someone always does. And, that being the case, it should be the E.U.

                  I’d love to live in the fantasy world where every country just minded its own business and left each other alone and we all just frolicked in fields of daisies…

                  But go and try to explain how that needs to happen to Putin, Xi, and Trump and see how far you get.