• iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Strictly speaking while you can prove things in mathematics, in science you can only disprove things. A theory which survives for a long time after a large number of experiments is widely accepted and can be trusted, but it is not proven.

    • skhayfa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      What do you mean by strictly speaking? Germ theory was proven by Pasteur experiments in the 19th century and confirmed by countless of scientists throughout the 20th Century to this day. What more proof do you want when you can literally see bacteria expand and colonize a medium?

      • dickalan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        And what if there is a discovery tomorrow that undos all that knowledge even though we have hundreds of years saying it’s true, OK so now you get it or do I have to explain further?

        • skhayfa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Please explain further. As of today when someone has a bacterial infection you have a direct evidence of it, you use an antibiotic, you kill the bacteria, you cure the illness. No miasmia, humors or worms involved. It’s like you are saying we have a space photo for a round earth but what if a discovery undo it tomorrow.