I thought FUD was a cryptobro term.

  • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re missing the point.

    The “Nazi bar” analogy has nothing to do with literal Nazis except by way of explanation. People tried to explain this to you already.

    The point is, when you allow people into your space who nobody wants anything to do with (and specifically because they will tend to attack those people and also they believe they are subhuman), you have decided that your space will be only for those people. Because everyone else will leave. If you don’t want that to happen, don’t let those people into your space. Up to you.

    • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      places like .world are also Nazi bars though

      when you allow people into your space who nobody wants anything to do with (and specifically because they will tend to attack those people and also they believe they are subhuman)

      this is /u/cm0002 in case you were wondering

        • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          People who spend all their time punching left when the US secret police are straight up disappearing people from the streets and sending them to a concentration camp should be treated like the Nazis they are, yes.

          • J-Bone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ok, I misunderstood what you were saying. I thought you were saying cm0002 is a Nazi or something like that.

            I disagree with the characterization of LW, but at least now I correctly understand what you are saying. 😀

              • J-Bone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                No, this is a ridiculous statement.

                Especially coming from someone from ML; an instance run by a group that openly supports imperialism (including by capitalists that they support), white-washes genocide and supports authoritarianism.

                • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  white-washes genocide and support authoritarianism

                  That would be .world the entire last election year telling people to shut up about Palestine and vote blue

                  I’m an anarchist, I don’t ‘support’ any of these parties beyond having a cautious optimism seeing China execute billionaires who misbehave.

                  • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    That would be .world the entire last election year telling people to shut up about Palestine and vote blue

                    I’ll only speak for myself: I was extremely vocal about Palestine and the horror of the genocide there, while also recommending that people vote “blue” because Trump would make that genocide somehow even much worse while also adding many additional horrors to the world.

                    Absolutely nothing was solved simply by refusing to vote “blue.” The problems were made much worse. That is exactly why I was recommending to vote “blue,” to avoid that happening. This weird strawman where people didn’t care about Palestine, and that’s why they wanted Kamala Harris to win, is totally fucking weird.

                    Also, the people pointing out that the .ml general consensus view is completely fine with genocide when it’s happening in Ukraine or Xinjiang absolutely have a point. You’re not anti-imperialist, if you are generally in agreement with the .ml hivemind (I don’t know if you are or not, just going by other interactions with people there).

    • Achugodblessme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tagging on this comment so people can see. HC is not exploding heads remastered lol idk why you ppl are obsessed with wanting it to be. I guess y’all are hard pressed on wanting an enemy or something? And that’s what I don’t understand.

      I’m jumping in here to pretty much explain what HC is and why it was created. (Alice site admin here)

      Let’s clear a few things up about HilariousChaosHC.

      I know some of you are under the impression that Hilarious Chaos is somehow tied to Exploding Heads. It’s not. It never was. And it never will be. I’m sorry to disappoint you if that’s what you were hoping for, but it’s just not true.

      Hilarious Chaos actually started as a WordPress site—a space for me to share the silly, ridiculous videos I make. The move to Lemmy happened for one simple reason: Lemmy has mobile apps, and I prefer using Android apps over websites. WordPress doesn’t have an Android app that works the way I want it to, so we migrated.

      If any of you took five seconds to browse our communities, you’d see what Hilarious Chaos is really about:

      Sloth Me

      Christie’s Perspective

      Governor Chris Christie’s Solo Videos

      Farts and Poop

      Shitty Ass Hilarious Chaos

      Random Shit - Stock Talk Videos

      One on One

      The Delicate Daisy Den

      What do all of those have in common? Pure silliness. This instance wasn’t created for political tribalism. It was created as a playground for my bizarre humor.

      As we federated, people started projecting onto us—spreading this weird narrative that we’re somehow the reincarnation of Exploding Heads. We’re not. Exploding Heads is gone. Its not coming back. Move on.

      Now, if we’re being really honest here, a lot of this drama comes down to one thing: Hilarious Chaos allows conservative content. We don’t allow Nazis. We don’t allow hate speech. But yes—we allow conservatives to post and speak like everyone else. And that rubs some of you the wrong way. So instead of being upfront and saying, “I don’t like that this instance allows conservatives,” you spin these false narratives.

      If you’re gonna criticize, at least be honest about what you’re mad about.

      • irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re right on most of that, but the few conservatives flood the news and politcs communities there.

        Avoiding a few other ones, the instance is fine.

          • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Don’t forget that they’re also one of the few remaining instances that let ban-evading trolls create alt characters and pretend to be someone else without question.

            • Donald J. Musk@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I wouldn’t know. I’m not obsessed with trying to figure out if people have alts, but as far as I know, I’ve never come across that there.

              • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Even though there’s evidence to prove you’re ban evading?

                Or wait…. Was Universal Monk banned from this instance? Someone should look into that.

                • Donald J. Musk@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  even though there’s evidence to prove you’re ban evading?

                  There is no evidence to prove that I’m ban evading. Because I’m not.

                  Or wait…. Was Universal Monk banned from this instance? Someone should look into that.

                  A quick search of his name shows that he’s actually on this instance, so he’s not banned from this instance anyway. So not only am I not ban evading because I’m not him; it wouldn’t be ban evading even if I were him.

                  Also, I’m not the subject of OP’s post, and I’m not the mod who banned OP.

                  • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Perhaps the admins/mods here would want to talk to the mod team at /Politics, and perhaps they don’t care. Either way, everyone knows who you are.

                    Let’s take a look:

                    Your BarryGoldwater alt was created on the exact same day as the one you’re using now, you both post in the exact same communities- saying the exact shame shit, about the exact same shit. The communities you post in? Amazingly and totally coincidentally run by either your Universal Monk account, or your DJM account!

                    Imagine that!

                    The banner art used on several of your alt’s all come from the same place, the shit-tier writing style in the description is the same shit-tier pseudo-intellectual rhetoric Universal Munk used to spew, and speaking of what Universal Monk used to spew…

                    You were flat-out busted quoting something word-for-word that was said by Universal Monk several months ago on /Politics.

                    All one has to do is just ask the mods there.

                    And if you’ve forgotten, I’m the one you PM’d with threats and personal attacks that finally got you banned from LW.

      • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re gonna criticize, at least be honest about what you’re mad about.

        I think about 80-90% of the criticisms here are, very openly and honestly, because of the “conservative” content on HC. Personally, I noted the relationship between the two, but I honestly don’t give too much of a shit what the instance used to be or what it is called now.

        I tried at quite a bit of length to explain to splinter what the issue was. Conservative viewpoints are allowed. I guess. Although they’re obviously unpopular, no one will stop you from making a community full of “Stephen Miller’s immigration policies are a really good idea” and “Trump negotiated cease-fires in Gaza and Ukraine, what a wonderful job he is doing.” What you guys are asking for is:

        • To be able to provide a safe space for those things, and correspondingly for people who have been ejected from other forums because their interpersonal behavior on Lemmy is about as gross as you’d expect from a person who believes those things. Which means inevitably your instance is going to be pretty much only that aside from your own content.
        • To also be popular

        That’s not going to happen. Innocent people are getting snatched up and getting shipped to turbo-prison to stay for life for no reason at all. Pretty soon if things continue they’re going to be dying and US citizens are going to be included in the ones getting snatched (more so than they are already). If you’re okay providing a platform for the people doing that, including for deliberate professionally-crafted lies that are trying to smokescreen the whole operation so that it can continue without reasonable people rising up to put a stop to it, people are going to get disgusted by you. If you’re okay with that, cool. If not, but you’re still doing those things, I’m not sure what to tell you.

      • saigot@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hilarious Chaos allows conservative content.

        Assuming you mean american conservativism then seems like the criticism is justified.