Your signature, “JK obv”, where obv is obviously short for Obviously; related to “JK row”, where row is of course short for Rowling.
If it were two ‘Rowlings’, you might be sisters. But being two 'JK’s, by logical deduction you must be the same person, having recently married and taken your husband’s surname, Mr. Obv(iously).
I’ve read this so many times but I just don’t get it. What do you mean?
Your signature, “JK obv”, where obv is obviously short for Obviously; related to “JK row”, where row is of course short for Rowling.
If it were two ‘Rowlings’, you might be sisters. But being two 'JK’s, by logical deduction you must be the same person, having recently married and taken your husband’s surname, Mr. Obv(iously).
Hence, your expanded name, “JK Obv née Row”
Flawless logic.
Yeah… Not sure how I missed that…
It was so obv