There are many reasons for an election win or loss. But the big one we care about in 2024 was widespread purging. It’s quasilegal, there’s evidence of it, it’s cheating, and it suppresses Democrat votes much more.
There were 7 billion people who didn’t immigrate into the US and thus didn’t vote, they were very clear as to why they didn’t come to America. That’s just as relevant as your 90 million, actually more because it’s 100x the people! Don’t get me started on extraterrestrials we didn’t find, there could be trillions. It was clear the reasons we didn’t fund SETI.
“Vandalizing isn’t vandalizing”. You made no argument here.
“Purging” you mean only allowing eligible voters to vote? It’s “quasilegal”? No each state is responsible to maintain updated and correct voter roles. There is nothing controversial about it. You lost the election. People didn’t want to vote and they openly spoke about why they didn’t. Most didn’t like either candidate and didn’t want to support either party. You lost the election and no one cheated just like the republicans in 2020.
Too many logical fallacies in your comment to reply without losing your attention span but I’ll try.
Eligible voters were removed, the link proves it. Quasilegal because it’s a gray area in the law, here’s litigation against the practice but only in some states and inconsistently, hence “quasi”: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/mass-purges-are-new-voter-suppression. Not controversial: a strange lie, of course it’s controversial, most people don’t believe your argument. People didn’t want to vote for Trump in China/India, that is more relevant than your argument as I’ve said before you circled back. No one cheated: false, again.
If that evidence is unconvincing, what evidence would you need to see to convince you? Would any evidence convinced you or do you choose to believe without caring about reality?
There are many reasons for an election win or loss. But the big one we care about in 2024 was widespread purging. It’s quasilegal, there’s evidence of it, it’s cheating, and it suppresses Democrat votes much more.
There were 7 billion people who didn’t immigrate into the US and thus didn’t vote, they were very clear as to why they didn’t come to America. That’s just as relevant as your 90 million, actually more because it’s 100x the people! Don’t get me started on extraterrestrials we didn’t find, there could be trillions. It was clear the reasons we didn’t fund SETI.
“Vandalizing isn’t vandalizing”. You made no argument here.
“Purging” you mean only allowing eligible voters to vote? It’s “quasilegal”? No each state is responsible to maintain updated and correct voter roles. There is nothing controversial about it. You lost the election. People didn’t want to vote and they openly spoke about why they didn’t. Most didn’t like either candidate and didn’t want to support either party. You lost the election and no one cheated just like the republicans in 2020.
One such review of evidence of what I’m saying that contradicts your argument:
https://sdvoice.info/trump-lost-vote-suppression-won-here-are-the-numbers/
Too many logical fallacies in your comment to reply without losing your attention span but I’ll try.
Eligible voters were removed, the link proves it. Quasilegal because it’s a gray area in the law, here’s litigation against the practice but only in some states and inconsistently, hence “quasi”: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/mass-purges-are-new-voter-suppression. Not controversial: a strange lie, of course it’s controversial, most people don’t believe your argument. People didn’t want to vote for Trump in China/India, that is more relevant than your argument as I’ve said before you circled back. No one cheated: false, again.
If that evidence is unconvincing, what evidence would you need to see to convince you? Would any evidence convinced you or do you choose to believe without caring about reality?