• jol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Hm, when I say owning a second home I don’t mean building a second home. I strictly mean owning a second estate. I don’t see how buying an existing estate to rent it out has anything to do with climate. It’s just an investment to buy it and rent it out, even without planning on it increasing in value.

    • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Don’t farm people. It’s a home not a financial instrument. If you want riches produce something of value. In that scenario you’re just jamming yourself between someone and their basic need for shelter with your hand out. A different problem than climate change to be sure, but problematic all the same.

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Hm I don’t know man. I’m not a landlord, I don’t even own a home. But I see renting as a useful service. Do landlords and estate companies abuse people? Absolutely. But I don’t see renting as evil per se. Buying a house/flat is a huge personal investment and risk, and I’m happy to rent for the time being until I’m ready to buy.

        • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          We could have co-op’s, instead we have profits. I wish you all the luck in buying your own home. But for me, where I’m at, I will forever pay rent to never own anything. Forever a second class citizen. All these apartments I’ve lived in with rents calculated not by necessity, but by what the market will bear. I’m pissed, and I think you should be too.

            • 0ops@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 days ago

              The landlord would be the capitalist in this scenario, no?

              • amorpheus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                13 days ago

                Everyone is, some are just in better positions than others.

                To me, this very much seems like a “don’t hate the player, hate the game” type of situation. It’s like companies not paying their “fair” share of taxes - they’re just following the laws. It’s up to us to change them if we don’t like it, just like the issue of having soulless corporations as landlords.