unboiled.info
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Leaflet@lemmy.world to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months ago

Mozilla’s response to proposed remedies in U.S. v. Google | The Mozilla Blog

blog.mozilla.org

external-link
message-square
20
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • firefox@lemmy.ml
  • hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
  • firefox@lemmy.world
  • technology@lemmy.world
5
external-link

Mozilla’s response to proposed remedies in U.S. v. Google | The Mozilla Blog

blog.mozilla.org

Leaflet@lemmy.world to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months ago
message-square
20
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • firefox@lemmy.ml
  • hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
  • firefox@lemmy.world
  • technology@lemmy.world
Last week the Department of Justice and some state attorneys general filed revised proposed remedies in the U.S. v. Google LLC search case. If the proposed
  • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Without the Google Search deal, Firefox will have less resources to build a competent browser.

    Firefox has neglected their browser for years, pursuing vanity features like pocket instead of implementing web standards.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      From Mozilla’s founder, jwz:

      Date Post
      2020-09-23 This is a pretty dire assessment of Mozilla
      2022-01-06 Mozilla blinked
      2023-12-29 Remember when Mozilla made a web browser?
      2024-01-05 My dinosaur just threw up in its mouth a little
      2024-06-20 Mozilla is an advertising company now
      2024-06-22 Mozilla’s Original Sin
      2024-10-03 Mozilla’s CEO doubles down on them being an advertising company now
    • epyon22@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Mozilla really needs the corporate ear. That’s what really did them in, google integrated into Active Directory group policy effectively making it a pretty good choice for corporate deployments. This would give leverage to have bigger donors. Outside of that is just to diversify but the vpn/privacy market is pretty saturated right now.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        There’s still a lot of room IMO for Mozilla to innovate in a privacy-respecting way.

        For example, partner with/acquire Axate (or DIY), and do a big marketing push to get websites on board with “casual payments” in lieu of ads. I think Firefox users would love this, and they can work with uBlock Origin to expose an API so users can disable ad blockers on conforming websites.

        But they’re not going to do that, which sucks.

        • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          users can disable ad blockers on conforming websites.

          We all know that this won’t happen. In reality there are only two major groups of people: Those who do not use ad blockers and have accepted ads everywhere, and those who use ad blockers and accept ads nowhere.

Firefox@lemmy.ml

firefox@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !firefox@lemmy.ml

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 1.16K users / week
  • 1.17K users / month
  • 3.35K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 19.5K subscribers
  • 1.01K Posts
  • 14.6K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • k_o_t@lemmy.ml
  • UI: unknown version
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org