• Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    We believe delivering Nokia’s 4G/LTE system to the lunar surface is a transformative moment in the commercialization of space and the maturity of the lunar economy.

    … I fucking hate capitalism.

  • Lantern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    We believe delivering Nokia’s 4G/LTE system to the lunar surface is a transformative moment in the commercialization of space

    Absolutely love the lack of regulation for space. Going to love seeing the Google tm Moon in 50 years.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Yeah, Eriksson too. Both pretty much abandoned their consumer phone business. They have pivoted to afaik mostly telecommunications infrastructure. But both companies do a bunch of other stuff.

      Nokia and Eriksson were really happy when Huawei started being kicked out of 5G infrastructure.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        That’s not a bad bet. Clearly telecommunications infrastructure is not going away and even radio towers are never going away until physics finds an alternative.

        I do kinda miss Nokia’s creativity tho

  • funkajunk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I know it kind of sounds silly, but this is some of the very first infrastructure on The Moon, and that’s pretty cool.

    The Moon will likely be our main port for travel within our solar system - if we made a lunar space elevator we would use it as our launch point without having to expend so much fuel launching from Earth like we do with traditional rockets.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      The moon rotates too slowly (about once every 30 days), you don’t want a space elevator for the moon, the tether would have to be ridiculously long.

      But there’s no atmosphere, so you have another good option: a linear accelerator, or mass driver. Basically you make a very long, very straight rail and use electromagnetism to accelerate a craft right up to orbital velocity. The only complicated part is constructing 50 km of rail, but I mean, it’s more time consuming than complicated. This is actually way more feasible than a space elevator.

      • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Wut? Impracticality aside, could they build such a “ridiculously long tether”? What’s they make it of? Musk farts? Can’t wait for him to bankrupt the u.s. and build a space elevator that breaks and shatters, ruining astronomy and prospects of drone explorations of Mars

          • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Nah, it wouldn’t do much damage. The tether’s whole job is to be strong, but light. And being a long, thin fiber, it’ll have a pretty low mass to surface area ratio (high drag in atmo). If it did come down, it would likely mostly burn up, or mostly be slowed down by the atmosphere.

            Additionally, the length of tether with the most tension on it will be the section nearest to the ground. If the tether snaps near the ground, the whole thing gets hauled up to orbit for good.

            To be clear, I’m actually not in favor of space elevators in general, I think there are many much more practical ways to get to orbit. I’m just saying that a broken tether should not be the end of the world.

            If you really want to build something like a space elevator though, you should check out the tethered ring concept: https://youtu.be/8B2iqiKehyM