cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 months agounsafeCodelemmy.mlimagemessage-square12linkfedilinkarrow-up117arrow-down12cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up115arrow-down1imageunsafeCodelemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 months agomessage-square12linkfedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squareKwdg@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 months agoNot needed, main in C++ implicitly returns 0 if there is no return
minus-squareLucy :3@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·3 months agoShould ≠ Needs to You can do it, and it will work, but it’s unclean and not best-practice. I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s undefined behaviour.
minus-squarexmunk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoJust to clarify. It is defined behavior - there’s plenty of undefined behavior in C but that ain’t one of them.
Not needed, main in C++ implicitly returns 0 if there is no return
Should ≠ Needs to
You can do it, and it will work, but it’s unclean and not best-practice. I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s undefined behaviour.
Just to clarify. It is defined behavior - there’s plenty of undefined behavior in C but that ain’t one of them.