That seems totally fine. If he is upfront with clients that images are AI generated/uptouched, not real photos, and that is what they are paying for, that’s just called running a business that innovated a saturated market. He found a way to produce a product and do it cheaper than everyone else.
Does it kinda cheapen out the experience from not capturing “real” memories? Personally I’d say yup. But that is my personal preference and not that of the clients.
Personally I would be more disturbed if he offered and delivered real photos but never had showed up at the wedding (to my knowledge as the client).
Bride just doesn’t get to choose how many fingers she has
Or actually have photos of people? Or it actually be her.
Like ai is good, but it’s not going to look like you
Eh a good or even average Lora will make a very good image of a real person that’s close to indistinguishable
With stable diffusion you can use real pictures or parts of real pictures and just let AI make up everything around it. It’s not like you’re generating the whole picture. You could, but it wouldn’t be useful for wedding pictures.
Then again it’s a greentext and as we all know: everything on the internet is true.
Photoshop has this stuff built in too nowadays, I believe.
Content-aware delete came out like 15 years ago. It’s not quite the same thing, but certainly adjacent.
I’m talking about this feature: https://www.adobe.com/au/products/photoshop/generative-fill.html
You could just take a photo of a person and then let Photoshop generate a whole wedding around them.
Lol, keep doing it, they should adapt. Stable diffusion is literally free.
Ai is cringe
Money is not cringe, however.
Money is kinda cringe tbh
Says anyone without money. If it were so cringe more people would be giving it up when they recieve it but noone ever really likes giving it up once it’s been had.
I have money though? And give some of it away. Hasn’t helped my dating life
Now you can prove you’re a scumbag with this one easy trick!
