According to records filed in the case, Achtemeier conspired with mechanics in garages and operators of truck fleets to disable the anti-pollution software installed on diesel trucks.

Coconspirators who wanted to disable their trucks’ pollution control hardware system—a process commonly known as “deleting”—sought Achtemeier’s help to trick the truck’s software into believing the emissions control systems were still functional, a process known as “tuning.”

Monitoring software on a deleted truck will detect that the pollution control hardware is not functioning and will prevent the truck from running. Achtemeier disabled the monitoring software on his client’s trucks by connecting to laptops he had provided to various coconspirators. Some of the coconspirators would pass the laptop on to others seeking to have the anti-pollution software disabled on their trucks. Once the laptop was hooked up to the truck’s onboard computer, Achtemeier could access it from his computer and tune the software designed to slow the truck if the pollution control device was missing or malfunctioning. Achtemeier could “tune” trucks remotely, which enabled him to maximize his environmental impact and personal profit.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Right, a Republican, exactly.

      The way they’ve all reacted to climate change denialism by actively trying to make pollution as bad as possible is wild. Even if the entire world’s scientific community was somehow wrong about global warming, shit like this and “rolling coal” would still be terrible for air quality, but these fucknuts apparently don’t care as long as they get to “own the libs”. This is peak “eating a shit sandwich to force other people to smell your breath” energy.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        People are dumb. I once saw a kid on a field trip shit his pants out of spite because we had to leave a petting zoo. It wasn’t an accident. He looked the teacher in the eye and letterrip

        • beansbeansbeans@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s a child who hasn’t learned how to emotionally regulate. It’s much worse when it’s an adult who is emotionally unintelligent. These people aren’t necessarily stupid, they’ve just never been taught how to manage themselves or given the tools to self soothe.

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’m saying millions of adults haven’t moved beyond pant shitting.

            • beansbeansbeans@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I understand. I’m highlighting that it’s not that these people are “dumb” - they’re capable of learning why climate change is an important subject matter - but rather that their inability to emotionally regulate results in them doubling down like a child, even if deep down they know they’re wrong.

              They react to their emotions rather than taking a moment to ask themselves why that is their response in the first place; this needs to be taught.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why? Just Why?

    I mean sure, there is some money aspect to it, fine.

    But why spend all that time and energy just to be able to pollute more. I mean, that is the benefit of more pollution? Even if you don’t believe climate change, polluii less shouldn’t be that hard to understand as something positive?

    I’m just… Not getting this. I’m assuming the guy has a mental illness that would explain this, maybe?

  • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The antipollution on a diesel engine (at least a big one) essentially reroutes the exhaust back through the engine and reburns it again. Before the antipollution devices were in place it wasn’t uncommon for big diesels to get 500,000 miles before they needed to be replaced. Now with the antipollution devices they’re getting somewhere in the neighborhood of 100k before they start having problems of significance.

    Those engines and their maintenance are expensive as hell. It saves a whole lot more than the $4,500 having that done. It saves them hundreds of thousands of dollars over the long haul.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I actually decided to search this because I thought the whole point of DEF was so trucks wouldn’t need to use an EGR like every car does.

      Apparently emissions is complicated and expensive lol, so lots of trucks have both.

      Newer models however have started creating systems that remove the EGR and instead rely solely on the SCR with a bigger DEF tank and a cleanup catalyst.

      I think DEF is still the right direction. Exhaust recycling has a ton of downsides that took car OEMs a while to hack their way around (or give up and plan for 150k mile expectancy).

      4,500 for a mod though is still pretty expensive for something you can do yourself. Most of that cost was probably due to it being illegal, not because it’s hard to accomplish.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The summary says he was having accomplices connect a laptop to the vehicle and then remotely accessing that laptop. Sounds like regular old ssh or rdp.

    • BlueLineBae@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Most cars come equipped with a sim card these days and there’s lots of news about how car companies are sending data about your driving habits to insurance providers. So um… Yeah.

    • hank_the_tank66@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Manufacturers try really hard to stop their proprietary software from getting out into the world, because when it does this is exactly what happens.

      Case in point: I have a $35 phone app that lets me change software configurations on my BMW, and it is great. Can’t change anything related to engine, aftertreatment, or safety though…which is a good thing.

      • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Flipside of this coin: this results in repair monopolies because users cannot repair their own vehicles and equipment and manufactures use this exact excuse to claim they HAVE to run a monopoly cause the EPA. Literally John Deere has said this.

        In truth, illegal vehicle mods have been and will always be a thing. Manufacturers should still provide all the tools to users to repair, and emissions checks on trucks will have to be smarter to catch cheaters. Make the penalty for a deliberate violation (willful not accidental) so egregious that no one would consider it, even if it saved 50k+ per truck.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    coconspirators

    It’s okay to keep the hyphen in there. It’s more readable, and also it’s once again a word.

    • Diesel engines can be tuned to be 10% more efficient ie better engine performance and better fuel economy if u modify the engine tuning to ignore the environmental tuning requirements that have been forced upon the manufacturers.

      as much as this guy sounds like an asshole should ownership not mean u can modify your own property as u see fit?