Here you go, a “real” source. He said there were more bullet ballots than there likely really are, but there’s still a really suspiciously high number of them. How is this not at least worth investigating?

  • macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Damn imagine if true, knowing that your US Government was illegally elected. This really should be investigated for the sake of the entire world.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Seems it’s been investigated enough and no surprises, the numbers are off and allegations based on no evidence.

      Remember when there was a bunch of idiots from the red camp, all bent on the idea Biden stole the election? Well, it’s that and the blue camp has idiots too. This is something we’ll have to get used to now, a bunch of idiots from X claiming Y stole the election.

      • macniel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        but it can’t be that off the margin. from 1% to 7.2% in the case of Arizona, thats highly suspicious. Also the theory shared by those computer scientists is too damn convincing so those ballots should be hand counted, imho.

        https://www.planetcritical.com/p/cyber-security-experts-warn-election-hacked

        Also I will never understand why USA insist on using Computers for voting.

        Or how a winner-takes-it-all approach is in any way fair or reasonable to the people.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Their “theory” amounts to, “the Internet exists”. They make no specific claim of a breach in election security and have no evidence of a breach. It’s all purely, “somebody could have reprogrammed the machines at some unknown time and place.”

          They have no theory for how such a reprogramming would be distributed. Just fear mongering about how computers can be programmed to do anything.

          • EndlessApollo@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            “partially debunking” here basically means “correcting numbers that were slightly too large and clarifying the explanation given is a hypothesis”. This is still suspicious as heck, especially given all the other ways republican politicians and voters and funders have tried to influence and tamper with the election