• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Of course but people selling/offering shitty tool options is not only expected, it’s guaranteed. I certainly do not understand this tendency to blame the machine or makers of the machine and excuse the moronic developer

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Nono i agree with you, people like that cant be trusted with tying their shoes.

        I just wanted to point out that the system is the way it is because of “idiot human here who actually has the ability to reason”

      • Kissaki@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Responsibility is shared. It’s not one or the other.

        Many people don’t know what they’re doing. That’s kind of expected. But a tool provider and seller should know what they’re doing. Enabling people to behave in a negative way should be questioned. Maybe it’s a consequence of enablement, or maybe it’s bad design or marketing. Where criticism is certainly warranted.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes the only people ever to blame are everyone but the people who actually did a thing. That’s the same reason voters aren’t responsible for trump, Democrats are. /s

      • Ethan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The person who uses the shitty tool is a moron. The person who makes the shitty tool is an asshole. At least in this case where the shitty tool is actively promoting shitty PRs.