• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Of course but people selling/offering shitty tool options is not only expected, it’s guaranteed. I certainly do not understand this tendency to blame the machine or makers of the machine and excuse the moronic developer

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Nono i agree with you, people like that cant be trusted with tying their shoes.

      I just wanted to point out that the system is the way it is because of “idiot human here who actually has the ability to reason”

    • Kissaki@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Responsibility is shared. It’s not one or the other.

      Many people don’t know what they’re doing. That’s kind of expected. But a tool provider and seller should know what they’re doing. Enabling people to behave in a negative way should be questioned. Maybe it’s a consequence of enablement, or maybe it’s bad design or marketing. Where criticism is certainly warranted.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes the only people ever to blame are everyone but the people who actually did a thing. That’s the same reason voters aren’t responsible for trump, Democrats are. /s

    • Ethan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The person who uses the shitty tool is a moron. The person who makes the shitty tool is an asshole. At least in this case where the shitty tool is actively promoting shitty PRs.