Police have shot and killed a polar bear that came ashore in northwestern Iceland, the first sighting of a polar bear there since 2016. It might have hitched a ride from Greenland on a floating iceberg.

  • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    I wouldn’t say it’s sufficient justification, to be honest. I guess it depends on the population to some degree. But since we caused this problem, I would say moving even a whole village out of polar bear habitat is worth the cost of shooting even one, and we can suppose there will be more to come. I think we have a responsibility to get the hell out of their space, even at a huge cost to us.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Sorry… you think an entire village needs to be moved when a polar bear is seen in Iceland? How would that even work?

      • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        What do you mean how would that work? Polar bear habitat is declared national park, inhabitants get assistance moving elsewhere. Extremely expensive? Yes. Complicated? Not really.

        I get that people aren’t gonna go for this, but I stand by the position that it would be the ethically correct thing, and we should be honest with ourselves that we are compromising on that.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          There are still literally tens of thousands of polar bears.

          As a global population for a species, that’s low.

          But as something that would mean relocating entire towns full of people — when towns are usually doing something important production wise and can’t just be moved willy nilly — that’s a whole lot.

          “Move an entire town”

          Then half a year later when the bear moves to another town, do it again. And again. And again.

          Seriously? Do you know the size of the town compared to the national population in Iceland?

          That’s just a logistical nightmare which wouldn’t even accomplish any of the virtues you’re signaling so hard.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            The polar bears aren’t following the people. It can absolutely hunt (and would prefer) a coastline.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                14 days ago

                And? You think it’s just going to keep going to the next town like some kind of horror movie monster?