• Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I love how this continues to crank out articles with 0 information and everyone speculating what it might be about.

    Don’t get me wrong, Nintendo are dickheads, but you can clearly see how everyone greedily clicks on these articles considering how often they get rehashed.

    • Agent Karyo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I am just curious, do you have a take on how Nintendo’s lawsuit could be legitimate? Even a high-level theory, surely if you are so concerned about speculation and “greedy clickbait”, you have some logical ideas to back this up?

      • slazer2au@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        There is not enough information to have a take on it. That is his point.

        The total amount of information out is:

        1. A filing has been made.
        2. They are claiming patent infringement.

        That is literally it.

        • Agent Karyo@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I would argue we do have enough information to have a take on it. What legitimate patent infringement case do you see in context of Palworld and Nintendo’s products? Be clear and specific.

          If you’re going to call for a ban on commentary, you need to have some of argument.

          From my perspective, it is crazy to defend some random corporation in this way when you can’t even come up with a basic explanation of why critical commentary is not justified at this stage.

          • slazer2au@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            What legitimate patent infringement case do you see in context of Palworld and Nintendo’s products? Be clear and specific.

            Without going through all of their patent filings no one can. So again, that is the point. Lack of info

            If you’re going to call for a ban on commentary, you need to have some of argument.

            Never said a ban on commentary, just hate bullshit articles.

            From my perspective, it is crazy to defend some random corporation

            Something I agree with you on. Let them fight. This discussion is in the context of bullshit articles with zero information.