• MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Wait, the reason they don’t use this potion is that it’s hard to make?

    Wouldn’t you make it once and use it to make more by just dumping random ingredients in a pot to get an infinite supply? It seems like the wishing for more wishes situation pretty straight up.

    This is what I get for letting you trick me into thinking about this dumb thing, I suppose.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Let’s be real.

    Rowling started out making a fairly bog standard magical kids book. It was all about the fantasy of being a wizard, and relied on tropes so old they get found in La Brea.

    This isn’t a bad thing. There’s nothing wrong with that kind of kid lit.

    But she wasn’t a good writer. She was mid tier at best. So the eventual success of the series got beyond her abilities. While the last book was much better overall than the first few, it still relied on shoddy world building because she had chased sales.

    She tried to turn a kid’s light fantasy into a YA fatasy-adventure. To an extent, it worked. And I don’t mean that it wasn’t successful, she had a hit on her hands because the idea behind it all was brilliant. It pulled from a long history of British youth fiction, and added in fantasy and magic and a ton of tropes.

    But from the perspective of a coherent story in a coherent world, ignoring the success in terms of sales, it was cobbled together without a plan, and it shows. It wasn’t until maybe order of the phoenix that she had a plan for how the story would end, and she had to do a lot of hand waving to make it happen.

    Again, that’s okay. Nothing wrong with a bit of light fiction. But, it had cultural impact way beyond its original scope. So it draws the same kind of analysis that something like LOTR does, and it just can’t compare. It barely holds up to comparisons with Narnia, and Narnia at least kept things vague and mystical without trying to get into the mechanisms under the hood.

    For whatever reasons, Harry, in the books, long before the movies, resonated with kids. So the series exploded. And now everyone pokes at it like it was ever supposed to be literature, with any serious thought behind it. It was all broad brush strokes on construction paper from the beginning, expecting anything in it to hold up to scrutiny is like expecting politicians to be honest and up front. It is what it is.

    • Donkter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I always say - to defend the series (which doesn’t need too much defending, it’s the most successful book series after the old testament > new testament > Quran trilogy). The magic of Harry Potter is that all of the fantasy magic works exactly as well as it needs to right at the moment that it’s directly in front of the readers eyes. As you mention, as soon as it leaves the view of the characters in the story, it literally blows up into nonsense. However, as the story is being told the magic used is awesome and just what the plot needs at that exact moment to move along.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        as the story is being told the magic used is awesome and just what the plot needs at that exact moment to move along

        That’s bad writing.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deus_ex_machina

        a plot device whereby a seemingly unsolvable problem in a story is suddenly or abruptly resolved by an unexpected and unlikely occurrence