• oce 🐆@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Some people think that because Python is the easiest language to learn, it’s going to be easy to learn programming with Python. But learning programming is still very hard, so many abstract concepts to grasp. Python just makes it a tiny less hard, almost insignificantly now that we can use an LLM to learn the syntax faster than than ever.

    • AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      In practice, Python is not easy to learn programming with. Not at all. I see beginners wrestling with Anaconda and Jupyter notebooks and I weep.

      The fact that pip is intentionally broken on macOS and some modern Linux distros sure doesn’t help. Everything about environment management is insane.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Comparing python env management to Ruby or rust or even Java for fucks sake just goes to show that nobody actually cares about how easy a language is to use, they just care about what is popular or what they think is popular.

        • oldfart@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ruby, of all the examples you could come up with? My Redmine is updated only every few years because I rarely have a whole day to deal with the mess that is Ruby deps managent.

          Java deals with this ellegantly.

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Huh? I assume you mean RubyMine and I have no clue what dependency issues you could be dealing with unless you’re on windows (which python is even worse with). You have one package manager and one build tool on Ruby, compared to Python’s now 16 tools. Ruby is the gold star for package management which is why both Rust and Elixir copied enormous parts of it when creating their tools cargo and mix.

            • oldfart@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              https://www.redmine.org/ is a standard rails webapp. Nothing special. Straightforward to update, just a few commands, the only quirk is that at least one step always fails. Some obscure bug in a dependency, some problem with expected vs installed system libraries, or my favourite, a Segmentation Fault.

              • tyler@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Conflating a Ruby on Rails app to all of Ruby is just not really fair. It’s like comparing Lombok to Java. Lombok is a hot fucking mess and Java app with it is gonna have difficulty at later points.

                Aside from that (I think rails is honestly terrible), just looking at the repo I can see that RedMine doesn’t use bundler, which is the singular standard in the Ruby community, so it’s like saying “a project I use uses Ant under the hood so Java is bad”. Like I said, there’s a reason that Rust and Elixir based their build tools off of Ruby’s.

                • oldfart@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I haven’t had any problems with redmine itself but with dependencies and the Ruby runtime.

                  And if you’re saying I don’t have enough experience to make claims about Ruby dep management, I can say the same about you Python. Works flawlessly for me.