Basically, what the title says. Do you use any app, that is proprietary, but either has no OSS alternatives or they’re all not good enough? If there is an alternative, what keeps you from switching?

  • Treeniks@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    It is not. FUTO calls it “source first” which just means “open source but with rules against bad actors”. Certainly far from proprietary.

    • JustMarkov@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If the license doesn’t meet the OSD and does not protect four freedoms, then it is not open-source.

        • JustMarkov@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Jokes aside, I find that attitude not very healthy.

          Calling a source-available license “not proprietary”, this is what not very healthy.

          “Source-first” or “fair code” are just a fancy ways to say “proprietary”.

    • compcube@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It is not open source, because it does not meet the definition of open source.