• AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    The first time I found myself in nano was when testing a distro fifteenor twenty years ago. I had to edit some files and it was the only available editor. The damn thing was a horror to use. I still have no idea who it caters to. I haven’t had to use it since though.

    • SomeLemmyUser@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Dunno what you used, but nano is literally a text editor that may be simple simple but it just works. Shortcuts are shown to the user, buttons work like you expect them to (arrow keys, ESC, shift, etc)

      With vim you open it and if you haven’t read 5pages of doc you won’t even be able to close it again. I see that its useful for power users, but for casuals who just want to edit a config once in a while nano is absolutely the way to go imho

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s not that simplle or user friendly when none of the usual shortcuts work. C-a did something completely unexpected.

        • SomeLemmyUser@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Well its shown to you at the bottom of the screen what it does…

          And if you want Ctrl v,c,s etc. To work like in word etc you can always use nano --modernbindings

          • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            They’re in Linux now, it should show the shortcuts they’ll encounter everywhere. Not leftovers from another system.