Note: their definition of “community” is quite problematic in many ways…

  • RobotZap10000@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I agree. The study seems a bit biased. In the article (or the previous in the series, I forgot), a study claims that religious children say that they have trusted persons more often than secular children. I (don’t) wonder how this might change if the child in question wasn’t cisgender and/or heterosexual.

    It is a very insightful article nonetheless. Thanks for sharing!

    • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I (don’t) wonder how this might change if the child in question wasn’t cisgender and/or heterosexual.

      Simple: non-cishet children quickly stop being part of religious communities, and so the religious community is very accepting to all its members. Classic survivorship bias.