• EatATaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Until someone actually breaks a law, suggesting that people should.be jailed for who they vote for is something I expect out of an idiotic authoritarians mouth, like trump.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ah, so you’re on the “willful ignorant” side.

      Trump has already committed several crimes. The classified documents case alone would be enough to put literally anyone else behind bars for several lifetimes. But Trump gets off with stealing literal boxes of the stuff and then selling it to the highest bidder. He got several people killed, but gets to get away with it because it was an “oFfIcIaL aCt”. Give me a fucking break.

      And that’s just one of his many crimes. Wake up and pay attention.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Trump’s a fucking criminal twat, and at best you’re a rube if you are voting for him.

        I recognize this, but it’s not a crime to be stupid and fall for his shit.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I recognize this, but it’s not a crime to be stupid and fall for his shit.

          unfortunately no, but the fact that you can even push criminals through presidency is, rather funny.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Nah, it’s the way it should be; jailing a political opponent should absolutely not be a way for someone in power to stop people from voting for someone. It’s just sad that this is going to protect an actual criminal.

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              so you’re saying a political opponent should be immune? Period?

              Because for the entire history of american politics, from the founding until now, that has never been the case. The president is no more immune than any average person, because the president is literally an average person, this is in the federalist papers.

              Like i don’t disagree, jailing someone to prevent them from running is absurd, but there are more nuanced and complete solutions to this problem like, having a functional justice system for example.

              • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                so you’re saying a political opponent should be immune? Period?

                No, absolutely not. How could one possibly come to this conclusion based on what I said? Are you okay?