• Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Kamala Harris is getting support from every major Democratic constituency — from progressives like Sen. Elizabeth Warren to establishment types like Hillary Clinton to moderates like Rep. Josh Gottheimer. There is no real opening for a rival.

  • anticolonialist@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    2 months ago

    There needs to be an open convention. NO one voted for Harris as President, assuming the job is hers is usurping the democratic election process. I could have sworn we were told we need to elect a democrat to preserve democracy

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 months ago

      The party candidate selection process has nothing to do with Democracy.

      The parties themselves have nothing to do with democracy. There’s nothing in the constitution about Democrats or Republicans, or their parties.

      All the parties are is a group of people that agree to put one name forward for their candidate. How they choose the candidate is entirely up to them, it didn’t used to be done via state wide primaries, it used to just be a bunch of old dudes at a convention picking someone.

      The democracy part is that anyone is allowed to put their name on the ballot for president if they meet the basic criteria, usually a minimum number of voter signatures and a filing fee. This is done for each state they want their name to be on the ballot for.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        You are legally correct, and morally wrong. If we had ranked choice voting it would be an entirely different situation.

        As long as we are trapped in a two party system this is entirely unacceptable and frankly just cause for revolution.

        I find it both hilarious and infuriating how supporters of the Democratic establishment make this argument when it suits them, then turn around and chastise third party voters. If our only real choice is to vote for one party or the other, then we either have control over who gets nominated or we live in a thinly veiled oligarchy.

        • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          They aren’t morally wrong. Just because something is a fact that they’re stating doesn’t mean they agree with it. Those are the rules of the game and they’re simply stating them.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            In the context they are offering a legalistic justification to a moral issue. The Democrats are not the party of democracy if they don’t, at a minimum, have an open convention.

            • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Mate, there isn’t enough time or words to even delve into this with you, but that’s not what morality is. Whether you agree with the current rules and legal system or not is not part of your morals when you’re simply stating the options legally.

        • slickgoat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          This is not the time for electoral reform. This is the time for voting. The only thing that will keep the orange sludge out of the White House at this point is unity.

          After this dumpster fire is over, please advocate for reform.

    • AIhasUse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      You miss the part where many democrats are so terrified of the image that has been painted of Trump that they would vote for a resurrected Hitler if they were told he was wearing a blue button.

      • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Democrats didn’t paint that image. Trump did.

        When someone tells you who they are, believe them.

        • AIhasUse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          How interesting. So when trump tells you he will fight for democracy, you believe him. What a confusing world you must be living in.

          • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s not what I said, and don’t put words in my mouth.

            It’s not what he says he’ll do, it’s what he says he is. He is a petty dictator who can’t stomach dissent or disagreement who will happily use anyone to further his own ends, and will happily take whatever interpretation of reality puts him on top, even if it means intentionally misreading and misinterpreting things.

            But I don’t have to tell you that. You seem to be quite well-versed in that technique yourself.

          • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            One of these two will have power in November. That is reality. The democrats are the lesser of two evils. People living in reality don’t have the luxury of choosing non-existent options, and have to pick from what is possible.