• BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    The party candidate selection process has nothing to do with Democracy.

    The parties themselves have nothing to do with democracy. There’s nothing in the constitution about Democrats or Republicans, or their parties.

    All the parties are is a group of people that agree to put one name forward for their candidate. How they choose the candidate is entirely up to them, it didn’t used to be done via state wide primaries, it used to just be a bunch of old dudes at a convention picking someone.

    The democracy part is that anyone is allowed to put their name on the ballot for president if they meet the basic criteria, usually a minimum number of voter signatures and a filing fee. This is done for each state they want their name to be on the ballot for.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      You are legally correct, and morally wrong. If we had ranked choice voting it would be an entirely different situation.

      As long as we are trapped in a two party system this is entirely unacceptable and frankly just cause for revolution.

      I find it both hilarious and infuriating how supporters of the Democratic establishment make this argument when it suits them, then turn around and chastise third party voters. If our only real choice is to vote for one party or the other, then we either have control over who gets nominated or we live in a thinly veiled oligarchy.

      • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        They aren’t morally wrong. Just because something is a fact that they’re stating doesn’t mean they agree with it. Those are the rules of the game and they’re simply stating them.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          In the context they are offering a legalistic justification to a moral issue. The Democrats are not the party of democracy if they don’t, at a minimum, have an open convention.

          • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Mate, there isn’t enough time or words to even delve into this with you, but that’s not what morality is. Whether you agree with the current rules and legal system or not is not part of your morals when you’re simply stating the options legally.

      • slickgoat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is not the time for electoral reform. This is the time for voting. The only thing that will keep the orange sludge out of the White House at this point is unity.

        After this dumpster fire is over, please advocate for reform.