• lemmyvore@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I get that they’re trying to figure out how to monetize it while staying kosher FOSS, and their first wording suggests they’d like to offer per-seat licensing.

    What I don’t get is what would compel me to get a license. I still can’t rely on it for anything serious. I’m basically using it as an UI for the face recognition models and that’s shoddy too. They’ve made it impossible to lean on it for anything else.

    I don’t want to sound like a hater because they’re obviously working hard on it but, God, you can tell they’re not professional developers and it’s so frustrating. Focus on doing something well, and stop breaking compatibility every other week.

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      What I don’t get is what would compel me to get a license.

      Ideally nothing. Maybe a sticker or a theme, but nothing important to the function of the tool. If the personal gratification that comes with offering financial support to a FOSS project (along with the resulting product itself) isn’t enough, then this “license” (or whatever they end up calling it) isn’t for you…ideally.

    • AustralianSimon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The impetus to pay once is supporting great Foss software. I personally think a donation model works for me but I don’t research human behaviour or marketing either.

    • geography082@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Just don’t monetarize then. Foss and community driven is just that like many other projects. Clearly these guys are trying to sell the shit