• morphballganon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 个月前

      If the DNC of the past is any indication, they’ll ignore voters and put up the most boring, uncompelling candidate they can.

        • John Richard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 个月前

          I wanted AOC but her last few posts have been cringe. She’s divisive, but that could have worked in her favor. Prob. will be Kamala. I think they should have an open convention & let delegates decide though.

      • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 个月前

        Correct.

        And Kamala is the most logical choice, because there will be the least amount of legal hurdles, since she was already on the ticket.

        And the Republicans already said they are going to mount legal challenges, which can easily lead to SCOTUS deciding the election. So I expect Sanders, AOC and progressives to strongly push for Kamala.

        But I fully expect the DNC to push forward some corporate candidate like Bloomberg.

        It’s going to be interesting.

        • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 个月前

          There are no legal hurdles. The private organization can nominate whomever they want regardless of their votes and their rules.

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 个月前

          You think the DNC is going to try to push out the centrist, sitting vice president of their party during a presidential election? The vice presidential that aligns with the majority of their constituents, has a huge war chest of money, and is a well know and generally liked member of the party?

          The DNC are idiots, but that makes no sense at all.