• Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    When did I say that? My statement points out that rituals to make yourself feel better about killing an animal do not change that animal’s experience of being killed or the moral weight of that action

    • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You said they were morally equivalent when you called it murder, and you said it again just now. Why does killing an animal for food carry any moral weight? Cheetahs don’t get any flak for hunting caribou.

      • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        A human is an animal too, so i might kill it for food with no moral weight to it. Great.

        But if you compare yourself to a cheetah, I get that your intellect and morals are just… Primal 😁

      • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You said they were morally equivalent when you called it murder

        I didn’t, actually

        and you said it again just now

        I didn’t, actually

        Why does killing an animal for food carry any moral weight?

        Because humans aren’t special unique beings with souls that make us the only ones with moral worth. Many animals are capable of suffering and emotion.

        Cheetahs don’t get any flak for hunting caribou.

        We are the ones with the social system allowing for moral frameworks to guide our decisionmaking. Cheetahs aren’t moral agents. And if they are, they follow cheetah morality. Plus, they are obligate carnivores anyway (which is why your cat should not be deprived of meat)

        • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You said they were morally equivalent when you called it murder

          I didn’t, actually

          Yes you did, that’s what the word “murder” means

          your cat shouldn’t be deprived of meat

          All right then. Do you believe that owning a cat is immoral, since in order for the cat to thrive, creatures with souls must die?

          • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            There are no creatures with souls. But no, I wouldn’t say keeping a cat in general is immoral. There are definitely ethical concerns around things like kitten breeding mills and letting cats roam around outdoors, though

              • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                We are the ones with the social system allowing for moral frameworks to guide our decisionmaking. Cheetahs aren’t moral agents … Plus, they are obligate carnivores anyway (which is why your cat should not be deprived of meat)

                please act in good faith or let me know that you’re not interested in doing so

                • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Why is me killing a chicken to feed to my cat morally acceptable, but me killing a chicken to feed to myself is not? In both cases the one with the moral code is doing the killing.

                  Do you believe that if there were a race of intelligent aliens who were obligate carnivores, they should be allowed to slaughter humans for food? It sounds like you think the answer is yes. I would agree, provided the humans were treated humanely.